Introduction
Schizophrenia (SZ) is a devastating psychiatric disorder, and the difficulties involved in treating and managing it make it one of the ten most expensive disorders for health care systems worldwide (Kessler et al,
2005). SZ is believed to evolve on the background of complex genome-environment interactions that alter the cellular homeostasis as well as the structural plasticity of brain cells. Thus, genetic predisposition and environmental risk factors seem to affect processes that eventually contribute to the manifestation of clinical symptoms (Nestler et al,
2016; Giegling et al,
2017; Robinson and Bergen,
2021). Despite the available pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment options, a significant number of patients do not benefit from these treatments in the long-term, underscoring the need for novel and potentially stratified therapeutic approaches (Samara et al,
2016). So far, drug development has focused on the human transcriptome that encodes proteins, but the success of this approach is limited (Spark et al,
2022). The transcriptome also consists of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) that represent about 98.5% of the entire transcriptome and which are recognized as key regulators of cellular functions (Ezkurdia et al,
2014). Therefore, RNA therapeutics represent an emerging concept that may expand current therapeutic strategies focused on the protein-coding part of our genome (Damase et al,
2021; Nemeth et al,
2023). RNA therapies utilize, for example, antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs), siRNA, microRNA (miR) mimics or corresponding anti-miRs to control the expression of genes and proteins implicated in disease onset and progression (Rupaimoole and Slack,
2017; Damase et al,
2021). Of particular interest are miRs, which are 19-22 nucleotide-long RNA molecules that regulate protein homeostasis via binding to target mRNAs, leading either to their degradation or reduced translation (Gurtan and Sharp,
2013). miRs have been intensively studied as biomarkers and therapeutic targets in cancer (Rupaimoole and Slack,
2017). There is also emerging evidence from genetic studies in humans as well as functional data from mouse models that miRs play a role in CNS diseases including SZ (Fischer,
2014; Martins and Schratt,
2021; Sakamoto and Crowley,
2017; Sargazi et al,
2022). In addition, several studies reported changes in miR levels in blood samples of SZ patients using either qPCR analysis of selected targets or genome-wide approaches. The current findings have been summarized in several review articles (Roy et al,
2020; Ghafouri-Fard et al,
2021; Tsermpini et al,
2022). Despite this progress, there are still only few reports on the function of candidate miRs (Liang et al,
2022). Nevertheless, analysis of miRs in liquid biopsies is highly valuable because one miR can affect many target genes, and thus changes in miR levels can indicate the presence of multiple pathologies (Zampetaki et al,
2012; Fischer,
2014; Condrat et al,
2020). Moreover, miRs also participate in inter-organ communication (Jose,
2015; Bayraktar et al,
2017), suggesting that alterations of miR levels in liquid biopsies may inform about relevant pathological processes in other organs, including the brain. This is important since the analysis of the molecular processes underlying neuropsychiatric diseases in postmortem human brain tissue is challenging because it might be affected e.g., by peri-mortem events or the timing of postmortem tissue sampling. Furthermore, the onset of the disease often precedes tissue collection by decades. In contrast, liquid biopsies such as blood samples are easy to collect on the premise that molecular changes in blood mirror changes in the brain. In this context, the analysis of the microRNAome in liquid biopsies could be a suitable approach to identify candidate microRNAs that may play a role in the onset and progression of SZ.
In the present study, we performed small RNA sequencing in blood samples of control participants (
n = 331) and schizophrenia patients (
n = 242) of the PsyCourse Study (Budde et al,
2018) (
http://www.psycourse.de/). By cross-correlating our findings with data from postmortem human brain tissue, we identified miR-99b-5p as a promising biomarker candidate that is decreased in blood and in the prefrontal cortex of SZ patients, and correlates with disease phenotypes. Furthermore, we found decreased levels of miR-99b-5p in the prefrontal cortex of mice to elicit SZ-like phenotypes and activate pathways linked to innate immunity. In line with these observations, inhibition of miR-99b-5p in microglia increased phagocytosis and reduced the number of synapses. Finally, we were able to demonstrate that this effect is controlled by the miR-99b-5p target gene
Zbp1, an upstream regulator of innate immunity (Kuriakose and Kanneganti,
2018). Taken together, our data suggest that targeting miR-99b-5p or its target
Zbp1 could provide a novel approach towards the treatment of SZ patients.
Discussion
In this study, we combined the analysis of blood samples and postmortem brain tissue to identify miRs involved in the pathogenesis of SZ. Using WGCNA as well as differential expression analysis in blood samples, we identified several miRs that differed between patients and controls and were significantly correlated with SZ phenotypes. GO term analysis of the confirmed target genes of these miRs hinted at a number of molecular processes of which pathways linked to immune function were overrepresented. Such a GO term analysis based on miR target genes is, of course, not ultimately conclusive but our observation is in agreement with previous studies showing that neuroinflammation plays a role in the pathogenesis of SZ (Buckley
2019; Rodrigues-Neves et al,
2022). To further refine the identification of miRs linked to SZ we also performed a differential expression analysis of the small RNA seq data obtained from blood as well as from postmortem brain tissue of SZ patients and controls. We eventually identified nine candidate miRs, miR-101-3p, miR-378a-3p, miR-21-5p, miR-192-5p and miR-103a-3p, miR-500a-3p, mIR-501-3p, miR-221-5p and miR-99b-5p. Except for miR-99b-5p, all of these miRs have been implicated in brain diseases and neuronal plasticity (Dong et al,
2021; Biselli et al,
2022; Zhang et al,
2021; Banach et al,
2022; Barbato et al,
2020; Mundalil Vasu et al,
2014; Zadehbagheri et al,
2019; Maffioletti et al,
2016; Qin et al,
2022; Yoshino et al,
2021; Tang et al,
2019; Van der Auwera et al,
2019). (Huang et al,
2021) and even specifically with SZ (Chen et al,
2016; Liu et al,
2017). Of particular interest is a recent study that found miR-501-3p to be decreased in blood samples of monozygotic twins discordant for SZ (Liang et al,
2022). These data are in agreement with our observation that miR-501-3p was decreased in SZ patients of the PsyCourse study as well as in the postmortem brains of SZ patients.
These data support the validity of our approach and we decided to study miR-99b-5p at the functional level. Inhibiting miR-99b-5p in the prefrontal cortex of mice led to impaired PPI and increased anxiety. PPI is impaired in SZ patients and in mouse models for SZ (Light and Braff,
1999; van den Buuse,
2010). Furthermore, increased anxiety is a phenotype often observed in SZ patients (Achim et al,
2011), suggesting that reduced miR-99b-5p levels are indeed linked to the development of SZ-like phenotypes. Nevertheless, these data cannot establish a clear causal link between reduced miR-99b-5p levels and the pathogenesis of SZ in humans, since no animal model can fully recapitulate the complex processes in human patients due to functional and structural differences in the cortical anatomy (van Heukelum et al,
2020; Feifel and Shilling,
2010).
However, that miR-99b-5p is involved in the pathogenesis in SZ is further underscored by the results of our molecular analysis. RNA-seq analysis of the prefrontal cortex of mice revealed that inhibition of miR-99b-5p mainly led to an increased expression of genes, which is in agreement with the established action of miRs in controlling mRNA levels. Furthermore, the upregulated genes were almost exclusively related to immunity pathways in microglia, a process which has been linked to the pathogenesis of SZ. For example, immunohistochemical analysis revealed altered microglia in postmortem brain samples of SZ patients (Bayer et al,
1999). In addition, epidemiological data demonstrated a correlation between immune diseases and SZ (Benros et al,
2011), while several neuroimaging studies reported an increase in activated microglia in the brains of SZ patients (van Berckel et al,
2008; Ottoy et al,
2018). Finally, studies in animal models have implicated aberrant microglia activation with the onset of SZ-like phenotypes (Juckel et al,
2011; Shelton et al,
2021). While miR-99b-5p has not been studied in microglia so far, these data are in line with previous reports demonstrating a role of the miR-99b in the modulation of inflammatory responses. For example, miR-99b levels are decreased in tumor-associated macrophages and re-expression of miR-99b attenuates tumor growth (Wang et al,
2020). Furthermore, inhibition of miR-99b in dendritic cells significantly elevated the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines including
Il1ß and
Tnfα (Singh et al,
2013). These findings are in agreement with our data showing that inhibition of miR-99b-5p in the prefrontal cortex of mice increased the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines including
Il1ß and
Tnfα in microglia that we had isolated from the brains of these mice via FACS. A strong upregulation of genes linked to inflammatory processes, including the upregulation of
Il1ß and
Tnfα, was also observed when miR-99b-5p was inhibited in IMG cells or primary microglia. This is interesting since increased
Ill1 ß and
Tnfα levels have been repeatedly reported in SZ patients (Momtazmanesh et al,
2019). For example, inhibition of TNF
α was recently shown to ameliorate disease phenotypes in different mouse models of SZ (Shelton et al,
2021).
Aberrant microglia activation can affect neuronal function via synaptic pruning, a process that is based on the phagocytic activity of microglia (Vilalta and Brown,
2018). We observed that inhibition of miR-99b-5p in IMG cells and in primary microglia increased their phagocytic activity. Moreover, cortical neurons co-cultured with microglia that were treated with anti-miR-99b oligonucleotides displayed differentially expressed genes, of which the downregulated genes were linked to GO terms such as synapse assembly, regulation of synaptic plasticity or dendritic spine organization. As for the upregulated genes, the most significant GO term was synapse pruning. Since our data also revealed that neurons co-cultured with anti-miR-99b-treated microglia indeed displayed a reduced number of dendritic spines, our findings suggest a scenario in which reduced levels of miR-99b-5p lead to an upregulation of pro-inflammatory processes in microglia, which eventually impacts on synaptic structure. This interpretation is in agreement with previous reports suggesting that aberrant microglia activation leads to pathological synaptic pruning, which in turn leads to plasticity defects which could drive the pathogenesis of SZ (Sellgren et al,
2019; Inta et al,
2017). Notably, the increased expression of several complement factors in microglia have been implicated in this process (Germann et al,
2021). In line with these data, we observed increased expression of key complement factors in primary microglia and in corresponding microglia/neuron co-cultures in which miR-99b-5p was inhibited, as well as in postmortem brain samples from SZ patients. In summary, these findings provide a plausible mechanism on how reduced levels of miR-99b-5p can contribute to the pathogenesis of SZ, namely the induction of a pro-inflammatory response associated with synaptic pruning. Nevertheless, we cannot exclude that additional mechanisms within microglia or other neural cells play a role.
MiRs mediate their biological action by controlling the expression of specific target mRNAs. Our data showed that within microglia, miR-99b-5p controls the expression of the
Zbp1 gene that plays an important role in the innate immune response (Kuriakose and Kanneganti,
2018). ZBP1 acts as sensor for Z-DNA/Z-RNA and controls inflammatory pathways such as type I interferon-signaling and other pathways, eventually leading to the upregulation of various pro-inflammatory cytokines including e.g., the induction of
IL1ß (Takaoka et al,
2007; Kuriakose et al,
2016; Muendlein et al,
2021).
These data suggest that reduced levels of miR-99b-5p in microglia contribute to SZ-like phenotypes because the tight control of
Zbp1 levels is lost. In line with this interpretation, we demonstrated that the administration of
Zbp1-ASO rescues the effects of anti-miR-99b treatment on SZ-like phenotypes in mice as well as in the corresponding cellular alterations observed in primary microglia from mice as well as in microglia derived from human iPSCs. Interestingly, the cellular processes we find to be affected by altered miR-99b-5p and
Zbp1 levels have also been implicated in other brain diseases. Thus, it will be important to investigate the role of miR-99b-5p and
Zbp1 in other neuropsychiatric diseases. Moreover, aberrant microglia activation and synaptic pruning is observed in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease (Hong et al,
2016), and ZBP1 also controls the NRLP3 inflammasome (Kuriakose et al,
2016), a key regulator of neuroinflammatory phenotypes in Alzheimer’s disease (Heneka et al,
2013). In this context it is interesting to note that one study found decreased miR-99b-5p levels in plasma samples obtained in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease when measured at 6 and 9 months of age, while increased levels were reported in older mice (Ye et al,
2015). These data might underscore the need for further study as to the role of
miR-99b-5p and
Zbp1 in microglia obtained from wild-type mice as well as mouse models for neuropsychiatric or neurodegenerative diseases at different ages. Indeed, it is well established that microglia undergo age-dependent functional changes and even differ between brain regions (Hart et al,
2012; Ayata et al,
2018).
There are other questions we could not address within the scope of this manuscript. It will for example be interesting to investigate the other candidate miRs we found in addition to miR-99b-5p. Similarly, it will be important to study the potential miR-99b-5p targets we found in addition to
Zbp-1 in the context of SZ. Another question relates to the mechanisms that underlie the downregulation of miR-99b-5p in SZ patients. In future projects it will be interesting to test for example whether miR-99b-5p is altered in SZ mouse models that are based on either genetic or environmental risk factors such as early life stress. In addition, it will be important to identify the source of elevated miR-99b-5p levels in blood samples of SZ patients. It is known that miRs can be transported from the brain to the periphery within exosomes (Mustapic et al,
2017; Bayraktar et al,
2017), and recent studies reported the isolation of microglia-derived exosomes from human blood (Kumar et al,
2021). While this approach is not undisputed, it will be interesting to apply such methods to the PsyCourse Study, which is, however, beyond the scope of the current work. Although our findings that miR-99b-5p is decreased in the brain and the blood of SZ patients support the idea that the changes in blood may reflect corresponding changes in the brain, we cannot conclusively answer this question at present. Rather, we suggest that the analysis of miR-99b-5p levels in blood may eventually help stratify patients for treatment, including novel approaches based on RNA therapeutics towards miR-99b-5p or
Zbp1. Finally, it will be important to study whether miR-99b-5p plays a role in other neuropsychiatric diseases or if it is specifically deregulated in schizophrenia patients. Along the same line, we have to acknowledge that in our in vivo experiments the knock down miR-99b-5p was not specific to microglia cells. While
Zbp1 expression in the brain is rather specific to microglia, miR-99b-5p expression is also observed in other cells. Thus, it will be interesting to study the role of miR-99b-5p in cell types other than microglia.
In conclusion, in the present study we identify a miR-99b-5p-Zbp1 pathway in microglia as a novel mechanism that likely contributes to the pathogenesis of schizophrenia. Our data also suggest that strategies to increase the levels of miR-99b-5p or inhibit Zbp1, for example via ASOs, could serve as novel therapeutic strategies for treating SZ patients.
Methods
Human subjects
Data collection and analysis of the PsyCourse cohort were approved by the Ethics committees of the University Medical Center Goettingen (UMG), responsible for the clinical centers of the UMG, Bad Zwischenahn, Eschwege, Asklepios Specialized Hospital Goettingen, Hildesheim, Lüneburg, Liebenburg, Osnabrück, Rotenburg, Tiefenbrunn, and Wilhemshaven (Az: 24/8/14), and the Medical Faculty of the Ludwig Maximilians University Munich (LMU), responsible for the clinical centers Munich and Augsburg (Az: 087-14). The small RNAome analysis was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Medical Center Göttingen (AZ 22/5/18). Blood samples (PAXgene Blood RNA Tubes; PreAnalytix, Qiagen) and behavioral data (Dataset
EV1) of control and schizophrenia patients (98.01% were of european origin) were obtained from participants of the PsyCourse Study (Budde et al,
2018). Psychiatric diagnoses were confirmed using the Diagnosis and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria. Control subjects were screened for psychiatric disorders using parts of the structured clinical interviews for mental disorders across the lifespan (MINI-DIPS). All subjects were assessed for psychiatric symptoms through a battery of standard tests including the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF), and the Beck depression inventory (BDI-II).
Postmortem human brain samples
Postmortem tissue samples (prefrontal cortex A9&24) from controls (n = 17; 5 females & 12 males; age = 62.3 ± 18.9 years, PMD = 19.7 ± 6.7 h) and schizophrenia patients (n = 13; 5 females & 8 males; age 57.7 ± 16.8 years, PMD = 21 ± 6.4 h) were obtained with ethical approval and upon informed consent from the Harvard Brain Tissue Resource Center (Boston, USA). RNA was isolated using Trizol as described in the manufacturer protocol using the Directzol RNA isolation kit (Zymo Research, Germany). RNA concentration was determined by UV measurement. RNA integrity for library preparation was assessed using an RNA 6000 NanoChip in a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies).
High throughput small RNAome sequencing
Small RNAome libraries were prepared with total RNA according to the manufacturer’s protocol with NEBNext® small RNA library preparation kit. All human subject small RNAome libraries were prepared with 150 ng of total RNA. Briefly, total RNA was used as starting material, and the first strand of cDNA was generated, followed by PCR amplification. Libraries were pooled and PAGE was run for size selection. For small RNAome, ~150 bp band was cut and used for library purification and quantification. A final library concentration of 2 nM was applied for sequencing. The Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform was used for sequencing and was performed using a 50-bp single-read setup. Illumina’s conversion software bcl2fastq (v2.20.2) was used for adapter trimming and converting the base calls in the per-cycle BCL files to the per-read FASTQ format from raw images. Demultiplexing was carried out using Illumina CASAVA 1.8. Sequencing adapters were removed using cutadapt-1.8.1. Sequence data quality was evaluated using FastQC (
http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/). Sequencing quality was determined by the total number of reads, the percentage of GC content, the N content per base, sequence length distribution, duplication levels, overrepresented sequences and Kmer content.
Data processing, QC, and differential expression (DE) analysis
Sequencing data was processed using a customized in-house software pipeline. Quality control of raw sequencing data was performed by using FastQC (v0.11.5). The quality of miRNAs reads was evaluated by mirtrace (v1.0.1). Reads counts were generated using TEsmall (v0.4.0) which uses bowtie (v1.1.2) for mapping. Reads were aligned to the Homo_sapiens GRCh38.p10 genome assembly (hg38). The miRNA reads were annotated using miRBase. Read counts were normalized with the DESeq2 (v1.26.0) package. Unwanted variance such as batch effects, library preparation effects, or technical variance was removed using RUVSeq for all data (v1.20.0; k = 1 was used for factors of unwanted variation). DeSeq2 was utilized for differential expression analysis and adjustment of confounding factors including age and sex. In the DESeq2 model, the PsyCourse data were corrected for sex, age, and medication in DeSeq2. Volcano plots were plotted with the R package EnhancedVolcano (v1.4.0).
WGCNA analysis
microRNAome co-expression module analysis was carried out using the weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) package (version 1.61) in R (Langfelder and Horvath,
2008). We first regressed out age, gender, and other latent factors from the sequencing data, and after that, normalized counts were log (base 2) transformed. Next, the transformed data were used to calculate pairwise Pearson’s correlations between microRNAs and define a co-expression similarity matrix, which was further transformed into an adjacency matrix. Next, a soft thresholding power of 8 was chosen based on approximate scale-free topology and used to calculate pairwise topological overlap between microRNAs in order to construct a signed microRNA network. Modules of co-expressed microRNAs with a minimum module size of 10 were later identified using cutreeDynamic function with the following parameters: method = “hybrid”, deepSplit = 4, pamRespectsDendro = F, pamStage = T. Closely related modules were merged using a dissimilarity correlation threshold of 0.25. Different modules were summarized as a network of modular eigengenes (MEs), which were then correlated with the different psychiatric symptoms and functionality variables (e.g., PANSS, GAF, etc). The eigengene refers to the first principal component of the expression level of all the genes within a module. It therefore condenses the information from multiple transcripts into a single representative expression profile. The module membership (MM) of microRNAs was defined as the correlation of microRNA expression profile with MEs, and a correlation coefficient cutoff of 0.5 was set to select the module-specific microRNAs. The Pearson correlation of MEs and psychiatric symptoms and functionality variable was plotted as a heat map.
Enriched gene ontology and pathways analysis
To construct the Gene Regulatory network (GRN) for miRNA-target genes we retrieved validated microRNA targets from miRTarBase (v 7.0) (
http://mirtarbase.mbc.nctu.edu.tw/). microRNA target genes were further filtered based on the expression in the brain. Brain-enriched expression was examined using the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) database. (GTEx Consortium). To identify the biological processes and their pathways in the miRNA-target genes, the ClueGO v2.2.5 plugin of Cytoscape 3.2.1 was used (Shannon et al,
2003). In the ClueGo plugin (Bindea et al,
2009) a two-sided hypergeometric test was used to calculate the importance of each term and the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure was applied for the
P value correction. KEGG (
https://www.genome.jp/kegg/) and Reactome (
https://reactome.org/) databases were used for the pathway analysis. To construct GRN for significantly deregulated mRNAs, the ClueGO v2.2.5 plugin of Cytoscape 3.2.1 was used. Biological processes (BP) and pathways with adjusted
p value < 0.05 were selected for further analysis. For further analysis, cellular metabolism and cancer-related biological processes were omitted. Key BPs with low levels of GOLevel (because terms at lower levels are more specific and terms higher up are more general) were further considered for data presentation and interpretation.
microRNA and mRNAs lipid nanoparticles preparation
LNA-based miR99b-5p inhibitor sequences (Qiagen) were used to inhibit the function of miR99b-5p. To decrease the expression of
Zbp1, corresponding anti-sense oligos (ASO) were employed. ASOs, inhibitor, and negative control sequences were purchased from Qiagen. Sequences and catalog numbers can be found in Datasets
EV16,
17). MicroRNA inhibitor, or ASOs lipid nanoparticle (LNP) formulation, was achieved using a proprietary mixture of lipids containing an ionizable cationic lipid, supplied as Neuro9™ siRNA Spark™ Kit (5 nmol). The miRNA inhibitor or ASOs were encapsulated using a microfluidic system for controlled mixing conditions on the NanoAssemblr™ Spark™ system (Precision Nanosystems, Canada). The experiments were performed as described in the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, 5 nmol lyophilized microRNA inhibitor or ASOs were dissolved in formulation buffer 1 (FB1) to a final concentration of 2 nmol. This solution was further diluted to a final concentration of 930 μg/mL. Formulation buffer 2 (FB 2), microRNA inhibitor/ASOs in FB1, and lipid nanoparticles were added to the cartridge and encapsulated using the NanoAssembler Spark system.
Animals
C57BL/6J mice were purchased from Janvier and housed in an animal facility with a 12-h light–dark cycle at constant temperature (23 °C) with ad libitum access to food and water. Animal experiments complied with relevant ethical regulations and were performed as approved by the Tierschutzbuero of the University Medical Center Göttingen in agreement with the Lower Saxony Ministry of Food and Agriculture (AZ 17/2733). All experiments were performed with 3 months-old male mice. Prefrontal cortex (PFC) region was dissected on day five after stereotaxic surgery for RNA-seq-based experiments.
Stereotaxic surgery
For intracerebral stereotaxic injections of LNPs in the PFC, 3-month-old mice were anesthetized with Rompun 5 mg/kg and Ketavet 100 mg/kg. After application of local anesthesia to the skull, two small holes were drilled into the skull. Mice then received a bilateral injection of LNPs of microRNA inhibitor/negative control or ASOs (dose: 0.15 μg/mL for microRNA inhibitor/negative control; dose: 0.3 μg/mL for ASO+ microRNA inhibitor mix). LNPs were injected with a rate of 0.3 μl/min per side. Only 0.9 μl of LNPs were injected per hemisphere (0.5 µl/min). After surgery, all mice were monitored until full recovery from the anesthesia and housed under standardized conditions.
Behavioral phenotyping
The open field test was performed to evaluate locomotory and exploratory functions. Mice were placed individually in the center of an open arena (of 1 m length, 1 m width, and side walls 20 cm high). Locomotory activity was recorded for 5 min using the VideoMot2 tracking system (TSE Systems). The elevated plus maze test was used to evaluate basal anxiety. Mice were placed individually in the center of a plastic box consisting of two open and two walled closed arms (10 × 40 cm each, walls 40 cm high). Their behavior was recorded for 5 min using the VideoMot2 system. Time spent in open versus closed arms was measured to assay basal anxiety phenotype. Prepulse inhibition (PPI) was performed to test the acoustical startle response (ASR). ASR was completed in an enclosed sound-attenuated startle box from TSA Systems. In brief, mice were placed individually inside a cage attached with a piezoelectric transducer platform in a sound-attenuated startle cabinet. These sensory transducers converted the movement of the platform induced by a startle response into a voltage signal. Acoustic stimuli were executed through speakers inside the box. The mice were given 3 min to habituate at 65 dB background noise and their activity was recorded for 2 min as baseline. After the baseline activity recording, the mice were tested to six pulse-alone trials, at 120-dB startle stimuli intensity for a duration of 40 ms. PPI of startle activity was measured by conducting trials for pre-pulse at 120 dB for 40 ms or preceding non-startling prepulses of 70, 75, 80, 85, 90 dB.
RNA isolation
Humans
PAXgene Blood RNA Tubes (PreAnalytix/Qiagen) were stored at −80 °C. For RNA isolation, the tubes were thawed and incubated at room temperature overnight. RNA was extracted according to the manufacturer’s protocol using PAXgene Blood RNA Kits (Qiagen). RNA concentrations were measured by UV measurement. RNA integrity for library preparation was determined by analyzing them on an RNA 6000 NanoChip using a 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies).
Mice
The mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation on day five after stereotaxic surgery. Unilateral PFC region was collected and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and later stored at −80 °C until RNA isolation. Total RNA was isolated using the trizol method as described by the manufacturer’s protocol using the Directzol RNA isolation kit (Zymo Research, Germany). The RNA concentration was determined by UV measurement. RNA integrity for library preparation was assessed using a Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies).
RNA sequencing
Total RNA was used for the library preparation using the TrueSeq RNA library prep kit v2 (Illumina, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. 500 ng RNA was used as starting material. The quality of the libraries was assessed using the Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies). Library concentration was measured by Qubit™ dsDNA HS Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Multiplexed libraries were directly loaded onto a Hiseq2000 (Ilumina) with 50 bp single-read setup.
The sequencing data were processed using a customized in-house software pipeline. Illumina’s conversion software bcl2fastq (v2.20.2) was employed for adapter trimming and converting the base calls in the per-cycle BCL files to the per-read FASTQ format from raw images. Quality control of raw sequencing data was carried out using FastQC (v0.11.5) (
http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/). Reads were aligned using the STAR aligner (v2.5.2b) and read counts were generated using featureCounts (v1.5.1). The mouse genome version mm10 was utilized.
Publicly available datasets
Various publicly available datasets were used in this study to explore cell type-specific expression of differentially expressed genes. Published single-cell data (McKenzie et al,
2018) were utilized to explore neuron-, astrocyte-, and microglia-specific expression of genes. Immunome-related genes were retrieved from the Immunome database. The Immune Response In Silico (IRIS) dataset was used to explore immunity-related genes (Ortutay and Vihinen,
2006; Abbas et al,
2005).
Primary microglia cultures
Primary mouse microglia cell cultures were prepared as previously described for wild-type pups (Islam et al,
2021). In brief, newborn mice (P1 pups) were used to prepare mixed glia cultures. Cells were grown in DMEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with 10% FBS, 20% L929 conditioned medium and 100 U ml
–1 penicillin–streptomycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Microglia were collected 10-12 days after cultivation by shake off, counted and plated in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 20% L929 conditioned medium and 100 U ml
–1 penicillin–streptomycin. The microglia were shaken off up to two times.
Ex vivo isolation of microglia
PFC regions were dissected, mechanically dissociated, and digested for 15 min with liberase (0.4 U/mL; Roche) and DNAse I (120 U/mL; Roche) at 37 °C. Subsequently, the cell suspension was passed through a 70 µm cell strainer. Myelin debris was eliminated by the Percoll density gradient. Single-cell suspension was labeled by using anti-mouse CD45 BV 421 (Clone 30-F11, Biolegend) and CD11b FITC (Clone M1/70, Biolegend). Antibody-labeled CD45low CD11b+ microglial cells were sorted using a FACSAria 4 L SORP cell sorter (Becton Dickinson) The purity of the sorted microglial cells was above 90%.
Primary neuronal culture
Primary neuronal cultures were prepared from E17 pregnant mice of CD1 background (Janvier Labs, France). Briefly, mice were sacrificed and the brains of embryos were taken out, meninges removed, and the cortex dissected out. The cortexes were washed in 1× PBS (Pan Biotech, Germany). Single-cell suspensions were generated by incubating them with trypsin and DNase before careful disintegration. One hundred and thirty thousand cells per well were plated on poly-D-lysine-coated 24-well plates in Neurobasal medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Germany) supplemented with B-27 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Germany). Primary cortical neurons were used for experiments at DIV10-12.
Magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) based cell sorting
Cells were isolated from the cortex of 3-month-old male C57B/6J mice using the adult brain dissociation kit (cat. no. 130-107-677, Miltenyi) according to the manufacturer’s protocol with minor modifications. Briefly, mice were sacrificed using pentobarbital and the brains were quickly removed. To remove major parts of the meninges, the brains were rolled over Whatman paper and then the cortices were dissected and placed into the enzyme mixes. The tissue was incubated at 37 °C for 30 min in a water bath and triturated gently three times during this period. Then, the samples were applied to 40 µm cell strainers and the protocol was followed for debris and red blood cell removal. Oligodendrocytes were isolated using Anti-O4 microbeads (1:40, cat. no. 130-094-543), astrocytes using Anti-ACSA2 microbeads (1:10, cat. no. 130-097-678) and microglia with Anti-Cd11b microbeads (1:10, cat. no. 130-093-634). Purity of the cell type populations was determined by qPCR.
Cell lines
All human iPSCs used in this study are commercially available and reported to be derived from material obtained under informed consent and appropriate ethical approvals.
Differentiation of microglia from induced pluripotent stem cells
Human induced pluripotent stem cells lines (hiPSCs) (Cell line IDs: KOLF2.1 J (Pantazis et al,
2022) were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory; BIONi010-C and BIONi037-A were both from the European bank for Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells) were differentiated to microglia as previously described (Haenseler et al,
2017). In brief, 3 × 10
6 iPSCs were seeded into an Aggrewell 800 well (STEMCELL Technologies) to form embryoid bodies (EBs), in mTeSR1 and fed daily with medium plus 50 ng/ml BMP4 (Miltenyi Biotec), 50 ng/ml VEGF (Miltenyi Biotec), and 20 ng/ml SCF (R&D Systems). Four-day EBs were then differentiated in 6-well plates (15 EBs/well) in X-VIVO15 (Lonza) supplemented with 100 ng/ml M-CSF (Miltenyi Biotec), 25 ng/ml IL-3 (Miltenyi Biotec), 2 mM Glutamax (Invitrogen Life Technologies), and 0.055 mM beta-mercaptoethanol (Thermo Fisher Scientific), with fresh medium added weekly. Microglial precursors emerging in the supernatant after ~1 month were collected and isolated through a 40 µm cell strainer and plated in N2B27 media supplemented with 100 ng/ml M-CSF, 25 ng/ml interleukin 34 (IL-34) for differentiation.
Quantitative PCR experiment
cDNA synthesis was performed using the miScript II RT Kit (Qiagen, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. In brief, 200 ng total RNA was used for cDNA preparation. HiFlex Buffer was used so that the cDNA could be used for both mRNA and microRNA quantitative PCR (qPCR). A microRNA-specific forward primer and a universal reverse primer were used for quantification. The U6 small nuclear RNA gene was employed as an internal control. For mRNA quantification, gene-specific forward and reverse primers were used. The relative amounts of mRNA were normalized against GAPDH. The fold change for each microRNA and mRNA was calculated using the 2–ΔΔCt method. The Light Cycler® 480 Real-Time PCR System (Roche, Germany) was used to perform qPCR.
Caspase 1 activation assay
Caspase-Glo® 1 Inflammasome Assay (Promega, Germany) was used to detect caspase 1 activation as described in the manufacturer’s protocol. In brief, microglia, treated with ASO/inhibitor or primed with LPS and stimulated with ATP, were seeded on opaque, flat-bottom 96-well plates (Cellstar, Germany) at 50,000 per well in 100 μl DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 20% L929 conditioned medium and 100 U ml–1 penicillin–streptomycin. 100 μl of Caspase-Glo buffer was mixed with cell medium. Plates were incubated at room temperature for 1 h. Luminogenic caspase activity was measured using a FLUOstar Omega plate reader (BMG Labtech).
Microglia phagocytosis assay
The microglia phagocytosis assay was performed as described. Primary microglia cultures were plated at a density of 18 × 104 in poly-D-lysine-coated 24-well plates in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 20% L929 conditioned medium and 100 U ml–1 penicillin–streptomycin. Immortalized microglia (IMG) cultures were plated at a density 5 × 103 in poly-D-lysine-coated 24-well plates in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 1X Glutamine (Millipore), and 100 U ml–1 penicillin–streptomycin. To evaluate phagocytosis, treated microglia were incubated with fluorescent latex beads of 1 μm diameter (green, fluorescent 496/519; Sigma-Aldrich) for 1 h at 37 °C, rinsed, and fixed with 4% formaldehyde. Cells were stained using the Iba1 (CD68) antibody (1:500; Wako) and DAPI. A confocal microscope was used for imaging at a low magnification (10×). ImageJ was used to quantify fluorescent latex beads. Region of interests (ROIs) were selected as microglial cells outlined with the Iba1 immunostaining to quantify beads. An intracellular section of the cell was selected to assure engulfment of latex beads by microglia. Similar acquisition parameters were used for each individual experiment. The results were expressed as the percentage of phagocytic index (# of total engulfed beads in an image/# of total cells identified in an image; n = 13 independent experiments).
Synaptic pruning in primary microglia neural co-culture
Primary cortical neurons were seeded at a density of 130,000 on poly-D-lysine-coated 13 mm coverslips in 24-well plates in Neurobasal medium supplemented with B-27. Primary cortical neurons were used for experiments at DIV10-12. Treated primary microglia cultures were harvested from T-75 flasks and 4000 cells were seeded to each neural culture well. Plates were kept at 37 °C for 3 days. On the third day, the cells were washed and fixed with 4% PFA (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) and 100 mM NH4Cl (Merck, Germany) respectively, at room temperature for 30 min. Next, the cells were washed in permeabilization and blocking buffer (0.1% Triton-X [Merck, Germany] + 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) [AppliChem GmbH, Germany]) on a shaker. The cells were then incubated with primary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. The antibodies used included synaptophysin 1 (guinea pig, SySy), PSD-95 (rabbit, Cell Signaling,), and Iba1 (goat, Abcam). After incubation, the cells were washed in PBS and then incubated with a secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. As secondary antibodies, Cy3 (donkey, anti- guinea pig, Jackson Imm.), Abberrior STAR 635p (goat, anti-rabbit) were used. Mowiol (Merck, Germany) and DAPI were used as a mounting medium. Images were taken with a multicolor confocal STED microscope (Abberior Instruments GmbH, Göttingen, Germany). Analysis of colocalization of pre- and post-synaptic markers were performed using SynQuant plugins in Fiji (v 2.0.0).
Dendritic spine analysis
As described above, primary cortical neurons and primary microglia were co-cultured and fixed with 4%PFA. Dendritic spines were labeled as described (Goldberg et al,
2021). In brief, the cells were aspirated and 2–3 crystals of Dil stain (Life Technologies-Molecular Probes) were added to each culture well and incubated on a shaker for 10 min at room temperature. Cells were washed with PBS until no crystals were visible and incubated overnight at room temperature. On the following day, the cells were washed and mounted with Mowiol. For high-magnification images, a multicolor confocal STED microscope with a 60× oil objective was used. Spine density and total spine length were measured by using ImageJ.
Protein extraction of primary microglia
Primary microglia cell lysates were used to detect ZBP1 in RIPA fractions. Primary microglia were seeded in a 6-well plate at a density of 1 × 106 in each well. Cells were collected in a RIPA buffer supplemented with 1 x protease inhibitor. Samples were kept on ice for 15 min and vortexed every 5 min and then centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C before supernatants were transferred to a new tube and stored at –20 °C. The protein concentration was measured using a BCA assay.
Immunoblot analysis
For standard immunoblot analysis, 20 μg of samples were mixed with 1× Laemmli buffer (Sigma, Germany), heated for 5 min at 95 °C and loaded onto 4–15% Mini-PROTEAN® TGX™ Precast Protein Gels (Bio-Rad, Germany). Proteins were transferred on nitrocellulose membranes and membranes were blocked with 5% BSA in PBS-Tween. Membranes were incubated with primary antibodies in 5% BSA in PBS-Tween. Fluorescent-tagged secondary antibodies (LI-COR) were used for visualization of proteins. Imaging was performed using a LI-COR ODYSSEY. HSP-70, GAPDH were used as a loading and run on the same gel.
Treatment of microglia
Microglia activation by LPS was used as a positive control. For this, microglia cells were first primed with 100 ng/ml ultrapure LPS (E. coli 0111:B4, Invivogen) and then incubated at 37 °C. After this, 5 mM ATP were added to the culture and incubated for 30 min. Caspase 1 assay and phagocytosis assay were performed from these cultures. For immunoblot, cell lysate was prepared. For miR99b-5p-related analysis, microglia were either treated for two days with miR99b-5p inhibitor/negative control or ASOs in T-75 after first harvesting or after harvesting cells were seeded in a 24-well culture plate.
Luciferase assay
Seed sequences of miR-99b-5p and pairing 3′UTR sequences of Zbp1 were generated with TargetScan. Cloned 3′UTR sequence of Zbp1 and scrambles UTR were purchased from Gene Copoeia (
https://www.genecopoeia.com/product/mirna-target-clones/mirna-targets/). UTR was cloned downstream to firefly luciferase of pEZX-MT06 Dual-Luciferase miTarget™ vector. The pEZX-MT06-scrambled UTR, pEZX-MT06-Zbp1 3′UTR or the mutated construct (cat. number: CS-MmiT101834-MT06-02-GC, Gene Copoeia) and miR99b-5p mimic or negative control were co-transfected into HEK293-T cells cultured in 24-well plates using EndoFectin™ Max Transfection Reagents (Gene Copoeia) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. 48 h after transfection, Firefly and Renilla luciferase activities were measured using a Luc-Pair™ Duo-Luciferase HS Assay Kit (for high sensitivity) (GeneCopoeia). Firefly luciferase activity and Renilla luciferase activity were normalized. The mean of luciferase activity and of Firefly/Renilla was considered for the analysis.
Statistical analysis
Unless otherwise noted, statistical analysis was carried out with GraphPad Prism software version 8.0. Statistical measurement is shown as mean ± SD. Each n represents a biological sample. A two-tailed unpaired t-test was used to compare two groups. If more than 2 groups were compared, a One-way ANOVA test was applied to analyze the data followed by post hoc analysis. Enriched gene ontology and pathway analysis was performed using Fisher’s exact test followed by a Benjamini-Hochberg correction.
Author contributions
Lalit Kaurani: Conceptualization; Formal analysis; Investigation; Writing—original draft; Project administration; LK designed the study, conducted cell culture and mouse-related experiments, generated and analyzed sequencing data from human and mouse samples, produced and analyzed imaging data, conducted qPCR experiments, interpreted results, prepared figures, and drafted and revised the manuscript.
Md Rezaul Islam: Data curation; Formal analysis; MRI performed stereotactic injections, carried out mouse-related experiments, analyzed WGCNA data, processed mouse PFC sequencing data, and analyzed imaging data.
Urs Heilbronner: Data curation; Formal analysis; UH collected and evaluated phenotypic data within the PsyCourse cohort.
Dennis M Krüger: Formal analysis; DMK curated PsyCourse sequencing data and assisted in its analysis.
Jiayin Zhou: Formal analysis; Investigation; JZ assisted with primary neuronal and microglial cultures.
Aditi Methi: Formal analysis; AM conducted WGCNA analysis.
Judith Strauss: Formal analysis; Investigation; JS supported with primary microglial culture and FAC sorting of microglia.
Ranjit Pradhan: Formal analysis; RP carried out Western blot analysis and performed revision work for Fig.
EV3 and Fig.
4.
Sophie Schröder: Formal analysis; Investigation; SS undertook MACS-based cell sorting and qPCR for Appendix Fig. S4.
Susanne Burkhardt: Investigation; SB helped with RNA sequencing experiments.
Anna-Lena Schuetz: Investigation; ALS performed qPCR analysis.
Tonatiuh Pena Centeno: Formal analysis; TP conducted and assisted with statistical analysis.
Lena Erlebach: Investigation; LE cultured hiPSC-derived microglia.
Anika Bühler: Investigation; AB cultured hiPSC-derived microglia.
Monika Budde: Resources; Data curation; MB analyzed phenotypic data within the PsyCourse cohort.
Fanny Senner: Resources; FS analyzed phenotypic data within the PsyCourse cohort.
Mojtaba Oraki Koshour: Resources; MOK analyzed phenotypic data within the PsyCourse cohort.
Eva C Schulte: Data curation; ECS analyzed phenotypic data within the PsyCourse cohort.
Max Schmauß: Resources; MS analyzed phenotypic data within the PsyCourse cohort.
Eva Z Reinighaus: Resources; Investigation; EZR analyzed phenotypic data within the PsyCourse cohort.
Georg Juckel: Resources; GJ analyzed phenotypic data within the PsyCourse cohort.
Deborah Kronenberg-Versteeg: Resources; Investigation; DKV cultured hiPSC-derived microglia.
Ivana Delalle: Resources; ID provided postmortem brain samples from schizophrenia patients and control, contributing to the data presented in Fig. 1F.
Francesca Odoardi: Investigation; FO conducted FAC sorting of microglia for Appendix Fig. S2.
Alexander Flügel: Investigation; AF conducted FAC sorting of microglia for Appendix Fig. S2.
Thomas G Schulze: Conceptualization; Resources; TGS secured funding, collected and analyzed phenotypic data within the PsyCourse cohort.
Peter Falkai: Conceptualization; Resources; PF secured funding, collected and analyzed phenotypic data within the PsyCourse cohort.
Farahnaz Sananbenesi: Conceptualization; Formal analysis; Writing—original draft; Project administration; FS secured funding, designed the study, supervised the research, interpreted results, and drafted and revised the manuscript.
André Fischer: Conceptualization; Formal analysis; Supervision; Funding acquisition; Writing—original draft; Project administration; Writing—review and editing; AF secured funding, conceptualized and designed the study, provided supervision, interpreted results, prepared figures, and wrote and revised the manuscript.