Report
10 January 2025
Open access

Female sex is linked to a stronger association between sTREM2 and CSF p-tau in Alzheimer’s disease

EMBO Mol Med
(2025)
17: 235 - 248

Abstract

In Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Aβ triggers p-tau secretion, which drives tau aggregation. Therefore, it is critical to characterize modulators of Aβ-related p-tau increases which may alter AD trajectories. Here, we assessed whether factors known to alter tau levels in AD modulate the association between fibrillar Aβ and secreted p-tau181 determined in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). To assess potentially modulating effects of female sex, younger age, and ApoE4, we included 322 ADNI participants with cross-sectional/longitudinal p-tau181. To determine effects of microglial activation on p-tau181, we included 454 subjects with cross-sectional CSF sTREM2. Running ANCOVAs for nominal and linear regressions for metric variables, we found that women had higher Aβ-related p-tau181 levels. Higher sTREM2 was associated with elevated p-tau181, with stronger associations in women. Similarly, ApoE4 was related to higher p-tau181 levels and faster p-tau181 increases, with stronger effects in female ApoE4 carriers. Our results show that sex alone modulates the Aβ to p-tau axis, where women show higher Aβ-dependent p-tau secretion, potentially driven by elevated sTREM2-related microglial activation and stronger effects of ApoE4 carriership in women.

Synopsis

image
This study examined whether sex, age, microglial activation or ApoE4 modulates the Aβ to p-tau axis, a critical event in the amyloid cascade that triggers the progression of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) from amyloidosis towards tauopathy.
Only sex but not age, sTREM2-related microglial activation or ApoE4 modulated the Aβ to p-tau axis.
Higher sTREM2-related microglial activation and ApoE4 positivity were linked to elevated p-tau levels, with stronger associations in women than in men.
Female sex is associated with a stronger Aβ-dependent p-tau secretion, potentially driven by elevated sTREM2-related microglial activation.

The paper explained

Problem

In Alzheimer’s disease (AD), the accumulation of Aβ pathology triggers the secretion of phosphorylated tau (p-tau) from neurons which drives the aggregation and spread of fibrillar tau pathology ensuing neurodegeneration and cognitive decline. Therefore, Aβ-related increases in p-tau are a critical event in the amyloid cascade triggering the progression of AD. Thus, it is of particular importance to characterize potential modulators of Aβ-related p-tau increases which may alter downstream tau aggregation and spread. Previous studies have linked female sex, microglial activation, younger age, and the genetic risk factor ApoE4 to altered tau levels in AD. Thus, we systematically tested whether these factors modulate the association between baseline levels of PET-assessed Aβ pathology and cross-sectional or longitudinal p-tau increases in the CSF.

Results

We found that higher amyloid-PET was linked to elevated p-tau where only female sex compared to male sex was associated with higher Aβ-related p-tau levels (i.e., interaction between amyloid-PET and sex). In contrast, higher sTREM2 levels and ApoE4 positivity were related to constitutively elevated p-tau across the low to high Aβ spectrum (i.e., main effect), while there was no effect of sex or age. However, sex further modulated the observed main effects, with higher sTREM2-related p-tau levels in women compared to men and a stronger effect in female ApoE4 risk allele carriers on p-tau levels compared to their male counterparts.

Impact

Together, our results show that ApoE4 and sTREM2 are associated with higher p-tau levels, with stronger effects in women. Of factors known to modulate tau pathology in AD, sex alone modulated the Aβ to p-tau axis, where female sex is associated with a stronger Aβ-dependent p-tau secretion, potentially driven by elevated sTREM2-related microglial activation. These findings help to understand heterogenous disease progression in men and women which might be critical for clinical trials, especially for drug treatments targeting microglial activation as a disease modifying approach.

Introduction

Beta-amyloid (Aβ) and tau are the hallmark pathologies of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), ensuing neurodegeneration and cognitive decline (Jack et al, 2018). Previously it was shown that Aβ-oligomers trigger the neuronal secretion of soluble phosphorylated tau (p-tau) (Jin et al, 2011), which in turn drives the aggregation and trans-synaptic spread of neurofibrillary tau tangle pathology (Pichet Binette et al, 2022). These findings indicate that Aβ-related p-tau increases are critical for the subsequent development of tau aggregates. While the sequence of the amyloid cascade is well-established (Glenner and Wong, 1984; Hardy and Selkoe, 2002; Selkoe and Hardy, 2016), the progression rate of Aβ-initiated tau accumulation differs significantly between patients, causing heterogenous disease trajectories and dynamics across patients (Dujardin et al, 2020; Komarova and Thalhauser, 2011; Landau et al, 2022). The aim of the present study is therefore to determine modulating factors of the Aβ to p-tau axis, which can help identify factors that accelerate or attenuate tau progression and determine targets to attenuate p-tau secretion and subsequent tau aggregation. To this end, we specifically focused on factors that have been previously associated with an increased risk of tau pathology in AD, which are female sex, microglial activation, younger age, and ApoE4, which is the main genetic risk factor for AD.
Accumulating evidence indicates that women are more severely affected by AD than men (Buckley et al, 2019b; Fisher et al, 2018; Laws et al, 2018; Levine et al, 2021; Mosconi et al, 2017; Nebel et al, 2018; Vest and Pike, 2013), accounting for two-thirds of AD dementia cases in the US (Alzheimer’s, 2014). Previous work revealed that women show increased levels of CSF total tau and p-tau (Hohman et al, 2018), tau deposition (Buckley et al, 2019b), and a faster tau accumulation rate compared to men (Smith et al, 2020). Recently it was found that faster tau accumulation in women was facilitated by a stronger association between Aβ fibrils and soluble p-tau in women compared to men, suggesting early Aβ-dependent tau secretion as a critical turnover point for the observed sex differences in AD (Wang et al, 2024). Although the driving mechanisms behind these findings are not fully clear, differences in sex hormones (Sundermann et al, 2020) and inflammatory processes (Casaletto et al, 2022) are assumed to play an underlying role in the manifestation of sex differences in AD. In this context, analysis of post-mortem brain tissue of older adults show that microglial activation mediated the association between Aβ plaque pathology and neurofibrillary tau tangles in women but not in men (Casaletto et al, 2022). An association between microglial activation and the accumulation and spread of tau in AD has been previously shown in vitro (Brelstaff et al, 2021; Maphis et al, 2015) and in vivo (Pascoal et al, 2021; Vogels et al, 2019), thus microglial activation may play an early key role in the amyloid cascade (Pascoal et al, 2021). From a mechanistic point of view, microglia are the brains innate immune cells, which react to hazardous stimuli with the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Once the hazard stimulus has been eliminated, microglia return to their original homeostatic resting state. However, in chronic inflammation, microglia lose their capability to return back to their homeostatic state, resulting in neurotoxicity and tissue damage (Bivona et al, 2023). The Triggering Receptor Expressed on Myeloid Cell 2 (TREM2) has been associated with a shift of microglia from homeostatic to disease associated states (Keren-Shaul et al, 2017; Krasemann et al, 2017), parallels PET-assessed microglial activation (Brendel et al, 2017), and is thus a well-established proxy for microglial activation (Ewers et al, 2020; Ewers et al, 2019; Franzmeier et al, 2020). We and others showed recently that increased CSF sTREM2 levels are associated with higher levels of p-tau in early phases of sporadic AD (Suarez-Calvet et al, 2019), and mediate Aβ-related p-tau increases in earliest Aβ fibrillization (Biel et al, 2023). Thus, microglial activation might have a pivotal role in the early pathogenesis of AD, with different effects in men and women.
A further potential modulator of the Aβ to p-tau axis might relate to the patient’s age. In addition to the effects of sex and sTREM2-related microglial activation, studies show that younger age at symptom onset is associated with a worsened prognosis and faster tau accumulation in sporadic AD (Frontzkowski et al, 2022; Koedam et al, 2008; van der Vlies et al, 2009). However, it remains unclear, whether younger age modulates the Aβ to p-tau axis towards a faster p-tau increase, which would support the view of a more aggressive form of AD when patients enter the amyloid cascade at younger age (Koedam et al, 2008; Touroutoglou et al, 2023).
Finally, genetic predispositions might play a critical role for early tau pathology. The ε4 allele of the ApoE-encoding apolipoprotein (ApoE4) is the main genetic risk factor for sporadic AD, and carriership of the ApoE4 risk allele has been linked to an oversupply of cholesterol, ensuing accelerated Aβ production (Lee et al, 2021), neuroinflammation (Ophir et al, 2005), impaired myelination (Blanchard et al, 2022), and tau-mediated neurodegeneration (Shi et al, 2017). Further, ApoE4 carriership is associated with lower levels of testosterone (Hogervorst et al, 2002), a sex hormone which is mostly expressed in males and associated with anti-inflammatory processes (Bianchi, 2019; Ota et al, 2012) and cholesterol clearance (Kilby et al, 2021). Previously, we showed that ApoE4 drives Aβ-related tau accumulation at lower levels of Aβ pathology, suggesting that in ApoE4 carriers, tau accumulation starts earlier than in ApoE4 non-carriers (Steward et al. 2023). In addition, several studies indicate that female ApoE4 carriers show enhanced levels of soluble CSF total tau (Altmann et al, 2014; Babapour Mofrad et al, 2020; Buckley et al, 2019a; Damoiseaux et al, 2012; Hohman et al, 2018) and p-tau (Babapour Mofrad et al, 2020; Hohman et al, 2018) compared to their male counterparts, hence, the association between ApoE4 carriership and Aβ-dependent tau might be further modulated by sex.
Together, female sex, microglial activation, younger age, and ApoE4-related genetic predisposition for AD have been previously associated with increased tau burden. The main aims of the present study were therefore to test, (i) whether sex, sTREM2-related microglial activation, younger age or ApoE4 modulate the Aβ to p-tau axis, and (ii) whether the effects of sTREM2, younger age or ApoE4 are stronger in women than in men.

Results

Sample characteristics

To assess whether sex, age, or ApoE4 modulates the Aβ to p-tau axis, we included 144 CN Aβ− controls, as well as 178 participants across the AD spectrum as defined by Aβ+ status [CN/MCI/Demented=48/115/15] with cross-sectional and longitudinal CSF p-tau181 data. The average follow-up time from baseline for p-tau181 was 3.54 ± 1.97 years. As expected, the Aβ+ group showed higher baseline levels of p-tau181, higher p-tau181 change rates and had a higher likelihood of ApoE4 positivity. For the assessment of CSF sTREM2 as a potential modulator of the Aβ to p-tau181 axis, only cross-sectional data were available. 160 CN Aβ− and 294 Aβ+ [CN/MCI/Demented=41/160/93] participants with sTREM2 and cross-sectional p-tau181 data were included. As for the longitudinal sample, the Aβ+ group showed higher p-tau181 levels. For detailed descriptive statistics, see Table 1.
Table 1. Demographics.
 
Controls (Aβ−)
AD spectrum (Aβ+)
p-values
Modulators sex, age, education, ApoE4
N
144
178
 
Clinical status (CN/MCI/Dem)
144/0/0
48/115/15
<0.001
Sex (male/female)
71/73
85/93
0.869
Age in years
72.72 (6.57)
73.35 (6.57)
0.394
Years of education
16.97 (2.38)
16.07 (2.57)
0.001
CSF Aβ1-42 (pg/ml)
1517.16 (552.09)
760.11 (315.95)
<0.001
CSF p-tau181 (pg/ml)
19.46 (7.22)
33.94 (15.17)
<0.001
Amyloid-PET (centiloid)
−7.87 (11.80)
76.73 (35.77)
<0.001
ApoE4 status (non-carrier/carrier)
119/25
66/112
<0.001
Follow-up CSF p-tau181 (mean years)
3.72 (2.18)
3.40 (1.77)
0.145
CSF p-tau181 change rate
0.38 (0.34)
0.75 (0.62)
<0.001
Modulator sTREM2
N
160
294
 
Clinical status (CN/MCI/Dem)
160/0/0
41/160/93
<0.001
Sex (male/female)
79/81
165/129
0.201
Age in years
72.60 (6.41)
73.81 (7.32)
0.079
Years of education
16.91 (2.39)
15.85 (2.71)
<0.001
CSF Aβ1-42 (pg/ml)
1411.73 (396.05)
631.87 (174.24)
<0.001
CSF p-tau181 (pg/ml)
19.73 (7.46)
34.52 (15.17)
<0.001
CSF sTREM2 (pg/ml)
3940.74 (1992.21)
3966.61 (2210.14)
0.902
Amyloid-PET (centiloid)
−7.22 (12.08)
82.55 (33.31)
<0.001

Values are presented as mean (SD); p-values were derived from ANOVAs for continuous measures and from Chi-squared tests for categorical measures.

Aβ status (−/+) was defined on global amyloid-PET SUVRs.

CN cognitively normal, MCI mild cognitive impairment, Dem demented.

Higher sTREM2 levels and ApoE4 as risk factors for increased p-tau181 levels

We tested first whether sex, CSF sTREM2, age, or ApoE4 are associated with increased cross-sectional or longitudinal CSF p-tau181 levels. To that end, we calculated main effects using ANCOVAs for nominal potential modulators (i.e., sex, ApoE4) and linear regression for metric potential modulators (i.e., sTREM2, age). We found that higher sTREM2 was related to higher p-tau181 levels (T = 10.098, p < 0.001, pFDR < 0.001, partial R2 = 0.186; Fig. 1C), and that ApoE4 was related to higher p-tau181 levels (F = 45.398, p < 0.001, pFDR < 0.001, η² = 0.13; Fig. 1F) and faster p-tau181 increases (F = 8.915, p = 0.003, pFDR = 0.009, η² = 0.03; Fig. 1G). Neither sex nor age were linked to constitutively higher p-tau181 levels (sex: F = 2.845, p = 0.093, Fig. 1A; age: T = 1.047, p = 0.296, Fig. 1D) or faster p-tau181 increases (sex: F = 1.611, p = 0.205, Fig. 1B; age: T = 0.938, p = 0.349, Fig. 1E). The results are summarized in Table 2. In line with previous work, we found that sTREM2-related microglial activation and ApoE4 positivity are related to higher levels in p-tau181, suggesting a critical role of both factors in the onset of tau pathology.
Figure 1. Main effects of potential modulators and CSF p-tau181 across Aβ− cognitively normal plus Aβ+ ranging from cognitively normal to AD demented (longitudinal sample: N = 322; sTREM2 sample: N = 454).
Significant main effects were found between CSF sTREM2 and cross-sectional CSF p-tau181 (C, p < 2e−16) and between ApoE4 carriership (non-carriers: n = 185; carriers: n = 137) and cross-sectional (F, p = 7.69e−11) and longitudinal (G) p-tau181 levels. Sex (male: n = 156; female: n = 166) (A, B) and age (D, E) were not associated with higher p-tau181 levels or faster p-tau181 increases. F and p-values were derived for nominal variables (A, B, F, G) from ANCOVAs, and standardized beta-estimates (β) and p-values were derived for metric variables (C, D, E) from linear regressions. (A) and (B) were controlled for age, education, clinical status, and amyloid-PET (in centiloid); (C), (F), and (G) were controlled for sex, age, education, clinical status, and centiloid; (D) and (E) were controlled for sex, education, clinical status, and centiloid. The center line of each boxplot (A, B, F, G) indicates the median (50th percentile), the bounds of the box show the interquartile range (25–75th percentiles), and the whiskers extend to 1.5 times the interquartile range from the edges of the box. * = pFDR < 0.05.
Table 2. Main and interaction effects of potential modulators on cross-sectional and longitudinal CSF p-tau181 levels.
Model
Covariates
Cross-sectional
Longitudinal
Main effects modulators on p-tau
  
ANCOVA
   
F
p
 
F
p
CSF p-tau181 ~ sex
Age, education, clinical status, CL
 
2.845
0.093
 
1.611
0.205
CSF p-tau181 ~ ApoE4
Sex, age, education, clinical status, CL
 
45.398
<0.001*
 
8.915
0.003*
  
Linear regression
  
β
T
p
β
T
p
CSF p-tau181 ~ sTREM2
Sex, age, education, clinical status, CL
0.371
10.098
<0.001*
   
CSF p-tau181 ~ age
Sex, education, clinical status, CL
0.051
1.047
0.296
0.051
0.938
0.349
Interactions CL x modulators on p-tau
 
β
T
p
β
T
p
CSF p-tau181 ~ CL*sex
Age, education, clinical status
0.206
2.746
0.006*
0.182
2.169
0.031#
CSF p-tau181 ~ CL*CSF sTREM2
Sex, age, education, clinical status
0.037
0.422
0.673
   
CSF p-tau181 ~ CL*age
Sex, education, clinical status
−0.137
−0.240
0.810
0.327
0.516
0.606
CSF p-tau181 ~ CL*ApoE4
Sex, age, education, clinical status
−0.045
−0.513
0.608
−0.138
−1.409
0.160

Main effects of sex and ApoE4 on p-tau181 were calculated using ANCOVAs and main effects of CSF sTREM2 and age on p-tau181 using linear regressions. Interaction effects between modulators and the association between amyloid-PET (in centiloid; CL) and p-tau181 levels were calculated using linear regressions. * = pFDR < 0.05; # = pFDR < 0.1.

Female sex is associated with stronger amyloid-dependent p-tau181 secretion

Next, we determined whether sex, CSF sTREM2, age, or ApoE4 specifically modulate the Aβ to p-tau axis and increase Aβ-dependent p-tau181 secretion, which may translate into faster downstream tau aggregation and spread. Here, we found that solely sex modulates the association between centiloid and p-tau181, where women compared to men showed higher Aβ-related p-tau181 levels (T = 2.746, p = 0.006, pFDR = 0.026; partial R2 = 0.023; Fig. 2A) and faster p-tau181 increases (T = 2.169, p = 0.031; partial R2 = 0.015; Fig. 2B) which reached trend level significance after FDR correction (pFDR = 0.092). Neither sTREM2, age, or ApoE4 modulated Aβ-related p-tau181 levels (sTREM2: T = 0.422, p = 0.673, Fig. 2C; age: T = −0.240, p = 0.810, Fig. 2D; ApoE4: T = −0.513, p = 0.608, Fig. 2F) or faster p-tau181 increases (age: T = 0.516, p = 0.606, Fig. 2E; ApoE4: T = −1.409, p = 0.160, Fig. 2G). The results are summarized in Table 2. The results indicate that sex is associated with modulation of the Aβ to p-tau axis, suggesting a stronger association between Aβ-dependent p-tau181 secretion and eventually faster tau aggregation in women compared to men. In contrast, our analysis did not provide statistical evidence that sTREM2, age, or ApoE4 significantly modulate the Aβ to p-tau axis.
Figure 2. Interaction effects of potential modulators on the association between amyloid-PET (in centiloid) and CSF p-tau181 across Aβ− cognitively normal plus Aβ+ ranging from cognitively normal to AD demented (longitudinal sample: N = 322; sTREM2 sample: N = 454).
A significant interaction effect was found between centiloid and sex (male: n = 156; female: n = 166) on cross-sectional (A) and longitudinal (B) p-tau181 levels (B only borderline significant after FDR correction). No significant interaction effects were found between centiloid and sTREM2 (C), age (D, E) or ApoE4 status (non-carriers: n = 185; carriers: n = 137) (F, G) on cross-sectional/longitudinal p-tau181 levels. Standardized beta-estimates (β) and p-values were derived from linear regressions. (A) and (B) were controlled for age, education, and clinical status; (C), (F), and (G) were controlled for sex, age, education, and clinical status, and (D) and (E) were controlled for sex, education, and clinical status. * = pFDR < 0.05; # = pFDR < 0.1.

sTREM2 promotes higher amyloid-dependent p-tau181 levels in women compared to men

Next, we aimed to test whether female sex is associated with a higher vulnerability for detrimental effects of potential modulators on CSF p-tau181 levels, and specifically, the Aβ to p-tau axis. To that end, we determined interaction effects of each potential modulator (i.e., CSF sTREM2, age, ApoE4) and sex on cross-sectional or longitudinal p-tau181 levels. The analysis revealed a significant effect of sex on the association between sTREM2 and p-tau181, with women showing a stronger association between sTREM2 and p-tau181 levels compared to men (T = 2.177, p = 0.030, pFDR = 0.045; partial R2 = 0.011; Fig. 3A). Post hoc analyses calculating separate linear regression analyses for men and women further revealed higher partial R2 values in women (T = 8.286, p < 0.001, partial R2 = 0.253) vs. men (T = 5.978, p < 0.001, partial R2 = 0.132), supporting a stronger association between sTREM2 and p-tau181 in women than in men. In addition, we detected a significant interaction between ApoE4 carriership and sex on p-tau181, where female ApoE4 carriers compared to male ApoE4 carriers showed higher levels of p-tau181 (T = 2.185, p = 0.030, pFDR = 0.045; partial R2 = 0.015; Fig. 3B) but no faster p-tau181 increases (T = 1.119, p = 0.264). There was no significant effect of sex on the association between age and p-tau181 levels (T = −1.005, p = 0.315) or p-tau181 increases (T = −0.735, p = 0.463). The findings show that the associations between sTREM2-related microglial activation as well as ApoE4 status on p-tau181 levels are stronger in women than in men.
Figure 3. Sex as modulator for the effects of CSF sTREM2 and ApoE4 carriership on CSF p-tau181 across Aβ− cognitively normal plus Aβ+ ranging from cognitively normal to AD demented (ApoE4 sample: N = 322; sTREM2 sample: N = 454).
Female sex compared to male sex (male: n = 244; female: n = 210) is associated with a stronger association between sTREM2 and p-tau181 levels (A). Stronger association between ApoE4 carriership (non-carriers: n = 185; carriers: n = 137) and p-tau181 in women than in men (B). 3-way interaction effect of centiloid, sTREM2, and sex on p-tau181 levels with women showing a stronger association between centiloid and p-tau181 with increasing sTREM2 levels (β = 0.312, T = 2.316, p = 0.021, pFDR = 0.063) (C). Standardized beta-estimates (β) and p-values were derived from linear regressions. (A) and (B) were controlled for age, education, clinical status, and centiloid. (C) was controlled for age, education, and clinical status. The center line of the boxplot (B) indicates the median (50th percentile), the bounds of the box show the interquartile range (25–75th percentiles), and the whiskers extend to 1.5 times the interquartile range from the edges of the box. * = pFDR < 0.05.
As a last step, we assessed whether sex further modulates the Aβ to p-tau axis by interacting with potential modulators. Thus, we assessed the association between centiloid, each potential modulator (i.e., sTREM2, age, ApoE4), and sex on cross-sectional or longitudinal p-tau181 levels. We detected a significant centiloid x sTREM2 x sex interaction on cross-sectional p-tau181 (T = 2.316, p = 0.021; partial R2 = 0.012; Fig. 3C), where higher sTREM2 levels in women were associated with higher p-tau181 levels at a given level of Aβ. However, the analysis only reached borderline significance after FDR correction  (pFDR = 0.063). Age or ApoE4 did not show interaction effects with sex on Aβ-dependent p-tau181 levels (age: T = 0.009, p = 0.993; ApoE4: T = 0.362, p = 0.718) or p-tau181 increases (age: T = 0.357, p = 0.721; ApoE4: T = 0.476, p = 0.634). The results are summarized in Table 3. These findings indicate that women show a trend for a different effect of sTREM2-related microglial activation on the Aβ to p-tau axis than men, which might result in higher tau burden and worsened disease progression in women.
Table 3. Effects of sex for the association between potential modulators and cross-sectional/longitudinal CSF p-tau181 and between potential modulators and Aβ-related cross-sectional/longitudinal p-tau181 levels.
Model
Covariates
Cross-sectional
Longitudinal
  
β
T
p
β
T
p
Interactions modulators x sex on p-tau
CSF p-tau181 ~ CSF sTREM2*sex
Age, education, clinical status, CL
0.179
2.177
0.030*
   
CSF p-tau181 ~ age*sex
Education, clinical status, CL
−0.542
−1.005
0.315
−0.442
−0.735
0.463
CSF p-tau181 ~ ApoE4*sex
Age, education, clinical status, CL
0.173
2.185
0.030*
0.100
1.119
0.264
Interactions CL x modulators x sex on p-tau
CSF p-tau181 ~ CL*sTREM2*sex
Age, education, clinical status
0.312
2.316
0.021#
   
CSF p-tau181 ~ CL*age*sex
Education, clinical status
0.008
0.009
0.993
0.352
0.357
0.721
CSF p-tau181 ~ CL*ApoE4*sex
Age, education, clinical status
0.051
0.362
0.718
0.075
0.476
0.634

Interaction effects between potential modulators and sex on p-tau181 as well as interaction effects between amyloid-PET (in centiloid; CL), potential modulators, and sex on p-tau181 levels were calculated using linear regressions. * = pFDR < 0.05; # = pFDR < 0.1.

Discussion

In the present study, we systematically assessed modulating factors of the Aβ to p-tau axis, i.e., a potentially critical driver of tau fibrillization in AD (Pichet Binette et al, 2022), to better understand heterogeneity in pathophysiological disease progression. Specifically, we assessed whether sex, microglial activation (i.e., sTREM2), age or genetic predisposition for AD (i.e., ApoE4) are associated with higher levels in p-tau181, and specifically, modulate the Aβ to p-tau axis. Since women are at increased risk of AD, we further tested whether effects of any potential Aβ to p-tau modulator are stronger in women than in men. First, we show that sTREM2 and ApoE4 are associated with higher p-tau181 levels and that the effects were even more pronounced in women than in men. Second, we show that solely sex modulates Aβ-dependent p-tau181 levels, with stronger Aβ-dependent p-tau181 secretion in women compared to men. Finally, we observed a trend for sex differences for the association between sTREM2 and Aβ-dependent p-tau181 levels, again, with higher p-tau181 levels in women than in men. Together, our results underline sex-specific dynamics in AD disease pathways with more severe consequences for higher p-tau181 levels in women. The findings are critical for patient stratifications in clinical trials, especially for drugs targeting microglial activation as a disease modifying approach.
Previously, higher levels of soluble (Hohman et al, 2018; Tsiknia et al, 2022) and aggregated tau (Buckley et al, 2019b; Shokouhi et al, 2020) were found in women compared to men. Congruently, we found that women showed stronger Aβ-related p-tau181 secretion and trend to have faster Aβ-related p-tau181 increases than men (pFDR = 0.092), with sex being the only tested factor that modulated the Aβ to p-tau axis. However, future studies are needed to further investigate the effect of sex on Aβ-related longitudinal p-tau propagation. Besides a main effect of sTREM2-related microglial activation on p-tau181 levels, we further revealed a stronger association between sTREM2 and p-tau181 in women than in men. When testing whether this observation could be applied to the Aβ to p-tau axis, we found a 3-way interaction of Aβ, sTREM2, and sex on p-tau181, showing that in women, higher levels of sTREM2 were linked to a stronger Aβ-dependent p-tau181 response. However, when applying FDR correction, the result only reached borderline significance (pFDR = 0.063), hence, future studies are needed to confirm this finding. In our previous work investigating disease stage-dependent effects of sTREM2-related microglial activation on p-tau181 increases, we found that in patients within earliest Aβ pathology (defined as Aβ CSF positive and amyloid-PET negative) (Palmqvist et al, 2017), sTREM2 mediated Aβ-related p-tau181 increases (Biel et al, 2023). In addition, early Aβ pathology was associated with glucose hypermetabolism, indicating that sTREM2 follows earliest Aβ fibrillization, which might manifest in activated microglia consuming more glucose (Xiang et al, 2021). Our current observations align well with findings using TSPO-PET as a proxy of microglial activation, where TSPO-PET was associated with higher tau-PET signals in female but not in male AD patients (Biechele et al, 2024). Similarly, in post-mortem investigations, microglial activation was linked to Aβ-related tau pathology in women but not in men (Casaletto et al, 2022). Hence, microglial-induced tau accumulation might be more pronounced in women than in men. Biologically, women are predisposed to higher levels of neuroinflammatory markers than men, which has been shown using TSPO-PET across studies in healthy adults (Tuisku et al, 2019) and animal models of amyloidosis (Biechele et al, 2020). Preclinical research found that microglia have transcriptional sex differences in adult brains, suspected to be caused by sex chromosomes as well as sex hormones that might be involved in microglial functioning (Guillot-Sestier et al, 2021; Kodama and Gan, 2019; Villa et al, 2018). In addition, women are more often affected by autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system, such as multiple sclerosis (Kalincik et al, 2013; Koch-Henriksen and Sorensen, 2010), which has been further attributed to maladaptive microglial activation (Yong, 2022). Thus, sex-specific differences in microglial activation in women might result in a higher vulnerability to chronic neuroinflammation, which may cause neuronal damage (Bivona et al, 2023; Jayaraman et al, 2021). It would be critical to assess, whether the observed association between sTREM2-related microglial activation and p-tau181 is mediated by pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., Interleukin 1β), which might result from prolonged microglial activation as a response to earliest Aβ fibrillization (Wang et al, 2015). Here, it should be tested, whether the threshold for a pro-inflammatory cytokine response differs between men and women. In addition, future studies should include additional markers related to neuroinflammation in the CSF (e.g., YKL-40, ICAM-1, VCAM1) (Janelidze et al, 2018; Popp et al, 2017) or tissue (e.g., TSPO-PET, FDG-PET) (Xiang et al, 2021) to address the underlying mechanism that link neuroinflammation and p-tau secretion. Moreover, future investigations could benefit from incorporating proteomic analyses to further explore more complex patterns of neuroinflammation markers, particularly those related to microglial activation. Detrimental effects of microglial activation in early disease stages of AD are in contrast to the observed positive effects microglial activation might have in later stages of AD, such as protective effects on Aβ pathology, neurodegeneration, and cognitive decline (Ewers et al, 2020; Ewers et al, 2019; Morenas-Rodriguez et al, 2022). We therefore suggest to consider subanalyses in clinical trials that are stratified by sex and disease stage, as our findings indicate that men and women show different dynamics in AD disease pathways. These might be driven among others by a different response to microglial activation and presumably earlier thresholds for Aβ-related neuroinflammation in women than in men.
Besides the association between sTREM2-related microglial activation and p-tau181, we observed a main effect of ApoE4 status on cross-sectional p-tau181 as well as longitudinal p-tau181 increases, which supports our previous work showing that ApoE4 enhances tau spreading using tau-PET (Steward et al, 2023). From a mechanistic point of view, it has been shown that the ApoE4 allele interferes with the absorption of polyunsaturated fatty acids, which are vital for the cell’s functioning. As a consequence of ApoE4, fewer nutrients can be absorbed, the cells become inflamed and ultimately die (Asaro et al, 2020). This inflammatory reaction might promote the secretion of soluble tau, similar to the observed effects of sTREM2-related microglial activation on p-tau (Biel et al, 2023). Indeed, previous work reported that ApoE4 facilitates microglia-related neuroinflammation and thereby might contribute to AD pathways (Kang et al, 2018; Krasemann et al, 2017; Parhizkar and Holtzman, 2022; Tai et al, 2015; Ulrich et al, 2018). Specifically, it was recently shown that ApoE4 activates microglia within brain regions that are prone to early tau propagation, and this effect was independent of Aβ (Ferrari-Souza et al, 2023). In addition, and in line with previous observations (Altmann et al, 2014; Babapour Mofrad et al, 2020; Damoiseaux et al, 2012; Hohman et al, 2018), we found that female ApoE4 risk allele carriers show higher levels of cross-sectional p-tau181 compared to male ApoE4 risk allele carriers. Importantly, higher microglia-induced inflammatory states were previously found in female ApoE4 carriers compared to male ApoE4 carriers (Mhatre-Winters et al, 2022), suggesting similar sex-specific associations between sTREM2- and ApoE4-related neuroinflammation and p-tau181 levels. However, with the data of the present study, causal conclusions are limited, thus, future work is needed to test the link between ApoE4-induced cell inflammation and subsequent p-tau secretion. Further, our finding of increased p-tau181 in ApoE4 carriers may reflect, in part, their predisposition toward earlier Aβ pathology onset and thus a more advanced disease stage (Therriault et al, 2021). Given that ApoE4 carriers in our study show higher Aβ positivity and load (Figs. 1 and 2), the observed association with p-tau181 could be influenced by their progression along the amyloid cascade. Future longitudinal studies with stage-specific controls would help clarify whether this relationship is independent of ApoE4’s effects on Aβ progression. In contrast, ApoE4 status did not modulate the association between Aβ and p-tau181, which seems surprising since ApoE4 has been extensively identified as a driver of Aβ pathology (Liu et al, 2017; Morris et al, 2010; Reiman et al, 2009). Similarly, the interaction between ApoE4 and sex on p-tau181 was no longer present when including Aβ as interaction term. Recently, we found that Aβ mediates the association between ApoE4 and faster tau accumulation in regions that are vulnerable for early tau aggregation (Steward et al, 2023), thus, ApoE4 might only drive Aβ-related p-tau increases in early AD disease stages, while in later disease, the effects of ApoE4 on p-tau might be independent of Aβ fibrillization. Along the same lines, it has been noted that the interaction between ApoE4 and sex on p-tau levels is only persistent in early disease stages (subjective cognitive decline and MCI, but not in dementia) (Babapour Mofrad et al, 2020), consistent with another study reporting an ApoE4 x sex interaction on tau-PET only within early regions of tau deposition (Wang et al, 2021). In the context of microglial activation and neuroinflammation, we also previously showed that sTREM2 mediates Aβ-related p-tau181 increases only in early Aβ fibrillization (Biel et al, 2023). It would be a key next step to test whether the observed sex interactions with sTREM2 and ApoE4 on p-tau181 are disease stage-dependent and whether they are related to each other.
Finally, we did not observe any effects of age on cross-sectional or longitudinal p-tau181 levels, neither a main effect nor an interaction with Aβ or sex. Older age is the major risk factor for developing AD (Guerreiro and Bras, 2015; Hou et al, 2019). However, younger age at symptom onset has been conversely found to be associated with accelerated tau accumulation (Smith et al, 2020), neurodegeneration (Moller et al, 2013), cognitive decline (van der Vlies et al, 2009) and higher rates of mortality in AD (Koedam et al, 2008). Therefore, we tested whether accelerated spread of tau in younger patients can be further explained by a stronger association between Aβ and p-tau181, which was not confirmed by our analyses. Therefore, faster tau accumulation in younger AD patients is unlikely driven by a higher Aβ-related p-tau response and it is unclear why tau accumulates in younger patients at a faster rate and whether female patients with an early onset show a faster spreading of tau. Here, future research should further address the underlying mechanisms of tau accumulation in patients with an earlier disease onset.
A strength of this study is the inclusion of several biomarker assessments in relation to sex differences in AD, investigating modulating effects on the Aβ to p-tau axis within a large sample ranging from cognitively normal to demented. However, several limitations should be addressed when interpreting our data. First, sTREM2 data have been obtained relatively late in the ADNI dataset, hence, data with subsequent CSF p-tau181 for assessing longitudinal relationships were limited. Since we previously show that sTREM2 mediated the association between Aβ and p-tau181 only in earliest Aβ fibrillization, we restricted the analysis on cross-sectional data for the sTREM2 sample in order to increase the sample covering Aβ− controls to Aβ+ patients across the AD spectrum to 454 participants. We encourage future studies to assess sex differences in longitudinal associations between Aβ, sTREM2, and p-tau181 once more data are available. Second, sTREM2 is only an indirect marker of microglial activation, thus other direct (e.g., post-mortem) or indirect (e.g., TSPO-PET) marker should be included in future studies. Third, in the present study, not sufficient tau-PET data were available to reliably test whether the stronger p-tau181 response in women promotes faster spreading of tau aggregates. Once more data are available, this might be an important target for future investigations. Finally, the analysis should be replicated in other cohorts than ADNI and include more diverse participant groups with different ethnicities in order to increase generalizability of our findings.
In conclusion, our findings show that sex is an important modulator of Aβ-dependent p-tau181 secretion. In particular, women show a stronger association between sTREM2-related microglial activation and p-tau181 than men, supporting the view that neuroinflammation may play a key role in the observed sex differences in AD. In addition, we found higher p-tau181 levels in female ApoE4 carriers compared to male ApoE4 carriers, which might be as well attributable to greater neuroinflammatory effects of ApoE4 in women. Our study provides evidence for sex-specific dynamics of AD disease pathways related to neuroinflammation and has potential implications for drug treatments targeting microglial activation, in which sex should be considered as an important modulating factor.

Methods

Reagents and tools table
Reagent/Resource
Reference or Source
 Identifier or Catalog Number
Experimental models
Alzheimer’s disease cohort sample
Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database (adni.loni.usc.edu)
 Phase ADNI2, ADNI3, ADNIGO
Recombinant DNA
Not applicable
  
Antibodies
Biotinylated polyclonal goat anti-human TREM2 antibody
R&D Systems BAF1828
 Suarez-Calvet et al (2016) sTREM2 cerebrospinal fluid levels are a potential biomarker for microglia activity in early-stage Alzheimer’s disease and associate with neuronal injury markers. EMBO Mol Med 8:466–476
Monoclonal mouse anti-human TREM2 antibody
Santa Cruz Biotechnology; B-3, sc373828
SULFO-TAG-labeled anti-mouse secondary antibody
Meso Scale Discovery
Oligonucleotides and other sequence-based reagents
Not applicable
  
Chemicals, Enzymes and other reagents
Not applicable
  
Software
R statistical software version 4.0.2
Statistical analysis: lmer, aov, lm.beta, lm
Visualization: ggplot
http://www.R-project.org; R Core Team, 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
 
Other

Participants

To determine the effects of sex, age, and ApoE4 on cross-sectional and longitudinal p-tau181 levels, we included 322 participants from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) with availability of 18F-florbetapir/18F-florbetaben amyloid-PET, ApoE4 status, demographical information (sex, age, education), clinical status as well as longitudinal p-tau181 data (>1 measurement). Baseline data had to be obtained within a time window of 6 months for participants to be included in this study. Participants were classified as ApoE4 risk allele carriers when at least one ε4 allele was present. For specifically assessing the effects of sTREM2, we included a larger sample of 454 ADNI participants with CSF sTREM2 in addition to available 18F-florbetapir/18F-florbetaben amyloid-PET, demographical information (sex, age, education), and clinical status. Only cross-sectional p-tau181 data were included for the sTREM2 sample since longitudinal p-tau181 was not sufficiently available to specifically assess effects of sTREM2-related microglial activation on p-tau181 change rates. Clinical status was defined by ADNI investigators as cognitively normal (CN; Mini Mental State Examination [MMSE] ≥ 24, Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR] = 0, non-depressed), mild cognitive impairment (MCI; MMSE ≥ 24, CDR = 0.5, objective memory-impairment on education-adjusted Wechsler Memory Scale II, preserved activities of daily living) or dementia (MMSE = 20–26, CDR ≥ 0.5, NINCDS/ADRDA criteria for probable AD). Aβ status (−/+) was determined using tracer-specific cut-offs for global amyloid-PET (i.e., Aβ+ = SUVR > 1.11/1.08 for 8F-florbetapir (Landau et al, 2012)/18F-florbetaben (Royse et al, 2021)). The study is in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was obtained by ADNI investigators, and all study participants provided written informed consent.

CSF acquisition

The ADNI biomarker core team at the University of Pennsylvania assessed CSF p-tau181 data using an electrochemiluminiscence immunoassays Elecsys on a fully automated Elecsys cobas e 601 instrument and a single lot of reagents for each biomarker. sTREM2 data were assessed using a previously described ELISA approach using the MSD Platform (Ewers et al, 2019; Kleinberger et al, 2014; Suarez-Calvet et al, 2016) and are provided in the ADNIHAASSWASHULAB.csv file on the ADNI database (variable “MSDSTREM2CORRECTED”). For a detailed description of the applied methods, see https://ida.loni.usc.edu.

MRI and PET acquisition and preprocessing

ADNI acquired 3T structural MRI of T1-weighted MPRAGE sequences using unified scanning protocols (http://adni.loni.usc.edu/methods/mri-tool/mri-analysis/). Amyloid-PET was recorded 50–70 min after 18F-florbetapir injection in 4 × 5 min frames or 90–110 min after 18F-florbetaben injection in 4 × 5 min frames. The recorded time frames were motion corrected and averaged to obtain mean images (http://adni.loni.usc.edu/methods/pet-analysis-method/pet-analysis/). Next, the Advanced Normalization Tools (ANTs (Avants et al, 2011)) high-dimensional warping algorithm was used to estimate nonlinear spatial normalization parameters based on structural skull-stripped T1-weighted images. After amyloid-PET images were co-registered to native-space T1-weighted images, the ANTs-derived normalization parameters were used to normalize the images to Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space. Amyloid-PET SUVRs were intensity normalized to the whole cerebellum. Global amyloid-PET SUVRs were transformed to the centiloid scale in order to harmonize between 18F-florbetapir and 18F-florbetaben Aβ tracers (Klunk et al, 2015).

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were performed using R statistical software version 4.0.2 (http://www.R-project.org) (R Core Team, 2021).
Baseline characteristics between controls (i.e., CN Aβ−) and Aβ+ were compared using ANOVAs for continuous and chi-squared tests for categorial data. Except for the CSF sTREM2 analysis where only cross-sectional data were available, all analyses were performed both on cross-sectional and longitudinal CSF p-tau181. Longitudinal p-tau181 was determined as the annual rate of change in p-tau181 using a linear mixed model with time from baseline as the independent variable, incorporating random intercepts and slopes to account for individual variability, with a covariance term between the random intercept and slope for each individual (Biel et al, 2023; Pichet Binette et al, 2022; Preische et al, 2019).
First, we tested the main effects of potential Aβ to p-tau modulators on cross-sectional and longitudinal p-tau181 levels. We calculated ANCOVAs for nominal potential modulators (i.e., sex, ApoE4) and linear regressions for metric potential modulators (i.e., sTREM2, age). Potential Aβ to p-tau modulators were included as independent variables and cross-sectional or longitudinal p-tau181 as dependent variable. The models were controlled for sex, age, education, clinical status, and amyloid-PET (i.e., centiloid), whereby sex and age were not included as covariates in the models testing sex or age as independent variable, respectively. For our main analysis, we aimed to investigate modulating effects of sex, sTREM2, age, and ApoE4 on the association between centiloid and p-tau181. To that end, we ran separate linear regressions, including centiloid and potential modulators as independent variables and cross-sectional or longitudinal p-tau181 as dependent variable. Covariates of the models were sex, age, education, and clinical status, whereby sex and age were not included in the models testing sex or age as independent variable, respectively. Please refer to Table 2 for a depiction of the statistical equations used within each model.
To further assess whether effects differ between men and women, we repeated the analyses for the main and interaction effects adding sex as interaction term. First, we assessed modulator (i.e., sTREM2, age, ApoE4) x sex interactions on cross-sectional or longitudinal p-tau181, including potential modulators and sex as independent and cross-sectional or longitudinal p-tau181 as dependent variable. The models were controlled for age, education, clinical status, and centiloid. Next, we examined 3-way interactions of centiloid, potential modulators, and sex on cross-sectional or longitudinal p-tau181. Here, we included centiloid, potential modulators, and sex as independent variables and cross-sectional or longitudinal p-tau181 as dependent variable. The models were controlled for age, education, and clinical status. Age was not included in the model testing age as independent variable. Please refer to Table 3 for a depiction of the statistical equations used within each analysis.
To assess effect sizes for significant results, partial R2 values were calculated for linear models and partial eta-squared (η²) for ANCOVAs.
Each of our four analyses (i.e., main effects, CL x modulator, modulator x sex, CL x modulator x sex) was corrected for multiple comparisons for cross-sectional and longitudinal measurements separately using the false discovery rate (FDR) approach within the p.adjust R function.

Data availability

All data used in this manuscript are publicly available from the ADNI database (adni.loni.usc.edu) upon registration and compliance with the data use agreement. The data that support the findings of this study are available upon reasonable request from the corresponding author.
The source data of this paper are collected in the following database record: biostudies:S-SCDT-10_1038-S44321-024-00190-3.

Author contributions

Davina Biel: Conceptualization; Data curation; Formal analysis; Investigation; Writing—original draft; Writing—review and editing. Marc Suárez-Calvet: Writing—review and editing. Anna Dewenter: Writing—review and editing. Anna Steward: Writing—review and editing. Sebastian N Roemer: Writing—review and editing. Amir Dehsarvi: Writing—review and editing. Zeyu Zhu: Writing—review and editing. Julia Pescoller: Writing—review and editing. Lukas Frontzkowski: Writing—review and editing. Annika Kreuzer: Writing—review and editing. Christian Haass: Data curation; Writing—review and editing. Michael Schöll: Writing—review and editing. Matthias Brendel: Conceptualization; Writing—review and editing. Nicolai Franzmeier: Conceptualization; Data curation; Formal analysis; Investigation; Writing—original draft; Writing—review and editing.
Source data underlying figure panels in this paper may have individual authorship assigned. Where available, figure panel/source data authorship is listed in the following database record: biostudies:S-SCDT-10_1038-S44321-024-00190-3.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Disclosure and competing interests statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Acknowledgements

Data used in preparation of this article were obtained from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database (adni.loni.usc.edu). As such, the investigators within the ADNI contributed to the design and implementation of ADNI and/or provided data but did not participate in analysis or writing of this report. A complete listing of ADNI investigators can be found at: http://adni.loni.usc.edu/wp-content/uploads/howtoapply/ADNIAcknowledgementList.pdf. We thank the ADNI participants and their families who made this study possible. The study was funded by grants from the LMU (FöFoLe, 1119, awarded to DB), the Hertie foundation for clinical neurosciences (awarded to NF), and the SyNergy excellence cluster (EXC 2145/ID 390857198).

References

Altmann A, Tian L, Henderson VW, Greicius MD, and Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative I Sex modifies the APOE-related risk of developing Alzheimer disease Ann Neurol 2014 75 563-573
Alzheimer’s A 2014 Alzheimer’s disease facts and figures Alzheimers Dement 2014 10 e47-92
Asaro A, Carlo-Spiewok AS, Malik AR, Rothe M, Schipke CG, Peters O, Heeren J, and Willnow TE Apolipoprotein E4 disrupts the neuroprotective action of sortilin in neuronal lipid metabolism and endocannabinoid signaling Alzheimers Dement 2020 16 1248-1258
Avants BB, Tustison NJ, Song G, Cook PA, Klein A, and Gee JC A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration Neuroimage 2011 54 2033-2044
Babapour Mofrad R, Tijms BM, Scheltens P, Barkhof F, van der Flier WM, Sikkes SAM, and Teunissen CE Sex differences in CSF biomarkers vary by Alzheimer disease stage and APOE epsilon4 genotype Neurology 2020 95 e2378-e2388
Bianchi VE The anti-inflammatory effects of testosterone J Endocr Soc 2019 3 91-107
Biechele G, Franzmeier N, Blume T, Ewers M, Luque JM, Eckenweber F, Sacher C, Beyer L, Ruch-Rubinstein F, Lindner S, et al. Glial activation is moderated by sex in response to amyloidosis but not to tau pathology in mouse models of neurodegenerative diseases J Neuroinflammation 2020 17 374
Biechele G, Rauchmann BS, Janowitz D, Buerger K, Franzmeier N, Weidinger E, Guersel S, Schuster S, Finze A, Harris S, et al. Associations between sex, body mass index and the individual microglial response in Alzheimer’s disease J Neuroinflammation 2024 21 30
Biel D, Suarez-Calvet M, Hager P, Rubinski A, Dewenter A, Steward A, Roemer S, Ewers M, Haass C, Brendel M, et al. sTREM2 is associated with amyloid-related p-tau increases and glucose hypermetabolism in Alzheimer’s disease EMBO Mol Med 2023 15 e16987
Bivona G, Iemmolo M, Agnello L, Lo Sasso B, Gambino CM, Giglio RV, Scazzone C, Ghersi G, and Ciaccio M Microglial activation and priming in Alzheimer’s disease: state of the art and future perspectives Int J Mol Sci 2023 24 884
Blanchard JW, Akay LA, Davila-Velderrain J, von Maydell D, Mathys H, Davidson SM, Effenberger A, Chen CY, Maner-Smith K, Hajjar I, et al. APOE4 impairs myelination via cholesterol dysregulation in oligodendrocytes Nature 2022 611 769-779
Brelstaff JH, Mason M, Katsinelos T, McEwan WA, Ghetti B, Tolkovsky AM, and Spillantini MG Microglia become hypofunctional and release metalloproteases and tau seeds when phagocytosing live neurons with P301S tau aggregates Sci Adv 2021 7 eabg4980
Brendel M, Kleinberger G, Probst F, Jaworska A, Overhoff F, Blume T, Albert NL, Carlsen J, Lindner S, Gildehaus FJ, et al. Increase of TREM2 during aging of an Alzheimer’s disease mouse model is paralleled by microglial activation and amyloidosis Front Aging Neurosci 2017 9 8
Buckley RF, Mormino EC, Chhatwal J, Schultz AP, Rabin JS, Rentz DM, Acar D, Properzi MJ, Dumurgier J, Jacobs H, et al. Associations between baseline amyloid, sex, and APOE on subsequent tau accumulation in cerebrospinal fluid Neurobiol Aging 2019 78 178-185
Buckley RF, Mormino EC, Rabin JS, Hohman TJ, Landau S, Hanseeuw BJ, Jacobs HIL, Papp KV, Amariglio RE, Properzi MJ, et al. Sex differences in the association of global amyloid and regional tau deposition measured by positron emission tomography in clinically normal older adults JAMA Neurol 2019 76 542-551
Casaletto KB, Nichols E, Aslanyan V, Simone SM, Rabin JS, LaJoie R, Brickman AM, Dams-O’Connor K, Palta P, Kumar RG, et al. Sex-specific effects of microglial activation on Alzheimer’s disease proteinopathy in older adults Brain 2022 145 10 3536-3545
Damoiseaux JS, Seeley WW, Zhou J, Shirer WR, Coppola G, Karydas A, Rosen HJ, Miller BL, Kramer JH, Greicius MD, and Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging I Gender modulates the APOE epsilon4 effect in healthy older adults: convergent evidence from functional brain connectivity and spinal fluid tau levels J Neurosci 2012 32 8254-8262
Dujardin S, Commins C, Lathuiliere A, Beerepoot P, Fernandes AR, Kamath TV, De Los Santos MB, Klickstein N, Corjuc DL, Corjuc BT, et al. Tau molecular diversity contributes to clinical heterogeneity in Alzheimer’s disease Nat Med 2020 26 1256-1263
Ewers M, Biechele G, Suarez-Calvet M, Sacher C, Blume T, Morenas-Rodriguez E, Deming Y, Piccio L, Cruchaga C, Kleinberger G, et al. Higher CSF sTREM2 and microglia activation are associated with slower rates of beta-amyloid accumulation EMBO Mol Med 2020 12 e12308
Ewers M, Franzmeier N, Suarez-Calvet M, Morenas-Rodriguez E, Caballero MAA, Kleinberger G, Piccio L, Cruchaga C, Deming Y, Dichgans M, et al. Increased soluble TREM2 in cerebrospinal fluid is associated with reduced cognitive and clinical decline in Alzheimer’s disease Sci Transl Med 2019 11 eaav6221
Ferrari-Souza JP, Lussier FZ, Leffa DT, Therriault J, Tissot C, Bellaver B, Ferreira PCL, Malpetti M, Wang YT, Povala G, et al. APOEepsilon4 associates with microglial activation independently of Abeta plaques and tau tangles Sci Adv 2023 9 eade1474
Fisher DW, Bennett DA, and Dong H Sexual dimorphism in predisposition to Alzheimer’s disease Neurobiol Aging 2018 70 308-324
Franzmeier N, Suarez-Calvet M, Frontzkowski L, Moore A, Hohman TJ, Morenas-Rodriguez E, Nuscher B, Shaw L, Trojanowski JQ, Dichgans M, et al. Higher CSF sTREM2 attenuates ApoE4-related risk for cognitive decline and neurodegeneration Mol Neurodegener 2020 15 57
Frontzkowski L, Ewers M, Brendel M, Biel D, Ossenkoppele R, Hager P, Steward A, Dewenter A, Römer S, Rubinski A, et al. Earlier Alzheimer’s disease onset is associated with tau pathology in brain hub regions and facilitated tau spreading Nat Commun 2022 13 4899
Glenner GG and Wong CW Alzheimer’s disease and Down’s syndrome: sharing of a unique cerebrovascular amyloid fibril protein Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1984 122 1131-1135
Guerreiro R and Bras J The age factor in Alzheimer’s disease Genome Med 2015 7 106
Guillot-Sestier MV, Araiz AR, Mela V, Gaban AS, O’Neill E, Joshi L, Chouchani ET, Mills EL, and Lynch MA Microglial metabolism is a pivotal factor in sexual dimorphism in Alzheimer’s disease Commun Biol 2021 4 711
Hardy J and Selkoe DJ The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease: progress and problems on the road to therapeutics Science 2002 297 353-356
Hogervorst E, Lehmann DJ, Warden DR, McBroom J, and Smith AD Apolipoprotein E epsilon4 and testosterone interact in the risk of Alzheimer’s disease in men Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2002 17 938-940
Hohman TJ, Dumitrescu L, Barnes LL, Thambisetty M, Beecham G, Kunkle B, Gifford KA, Bush WS, Chibnik LB, Mukherjee S, et al. Sex-specific association of apolipoprotein E with cerebrospinal fluid levels of tau JAMA Neurol 2018 75 989-998
Hou Y, Dan X, Babbar M, Wei Y, Hasselbalch SG, Croteau DL, and Bohr VA Ageing as a risk factor for neurodegenerative disease Nat Rev Neurol 2019 15 565-581
Jack CR, Bennett DA, Blennow K, Carrillo MC, Dunn B, Haeberlein SB, Holtzman DM, Jagust W, Jessen F, Karlawish J, et al. NIA-AA Research Framework: Toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease Alzheimer’s Dement 2018 14 535-562
Janelidze S, Mattsson N, Stomrud E, Lindberg O, Palmqvist S, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, and Hansson O CSF biomarkers of neuroinflammation and cerebrovascular dysfunction in early Alzheimer disease Neurology 2018 91 e867-e877
Jayaraman A, Htike TT, James R, Picon C, and Reynolds R TNF-mediated neuroinflammation is linked to neuronal necroptosis in Alzheimer’s disease hippocampus Acta Neuropathol Commun 2021 9 159
Jin M, Shepardson N, Yang T, Chen G, Walsh D, and Selkoe DJ Soluble amyloid beta-protein dimers isolated from Alzheimer cortex directly induce Tau hyperphosphorylation and neuritic degeneration Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011 108 5819-5824
Kalincik T, Vivek V, Jokubaitis V, Lechner-Scott J, Trojano M, Izquierdo G, Lugaresi A, Grand’maison F, Hupperts R, Oreja-Guevara C, et al. Sex as a determinant of relapse incidence and progressive course of multiple sclerosis Brain 2013 136 3609-3617
Kang SS, Ebbert MTW, Baker KE, Cook C, Wang X, Sens JP, Kocher JP, Petrucelli L, and Fryer JD Microglial translational profiling reveals a convergent APOE pathway from aging, amyloid, and tau J Exp Med 2018 215 2235-2245
Keren-Shaul H, Spinrad A, Weiner A, Matcovitch-Natan O, Dvir-Szternfeld R, Ulland TK, David E, Baruch K, Lara-Astaiso D, Toth B, et al. A unique microglia type associated with restricting development of Alzheimer’s disease Cell 2017 169 1276-1290.e1217
Kilby EL, Kelly DM, and Jones TH Testosterone stimulates cholesterol clearance from human macrophages by activating LXRalpha Life Sci 2021 269 119040
Kleinberger G, Yamanishi Y, Suarez-Calvet M, Czirr E, Lohmann E, Cuyvers E, Struyfs H, Pettkus N, Wenninger-Weinzierl A, Mazaheri F, et al. TREM2 mutations implicated in neurodegeneration impair cell surface transport and phagocytosis Sci Transl Med 2014 6 243ra286
Klunk WE, Koeppe RA, Price JC, Benzinger TL, Devous MD Sr, Jagust WJ, Johnson KA, Mathis CA, Minhas D, Pontecorvo MJ, et al. The Centiloid Project: standardizing quantitative amyloid plaque estimation by PET Alzheimers Dement 2015 11 1-15. e11-14
Koch-Henriksen N and Sorensen PS The changing demographic pattern of multiple sclerosis epidemiology Lancet Neurol 2010 9 520-532
Kodama L and Gan L Do microglial sex differences contribute to sex differences in neurodegenerative diseases? Trends Mol Med 2019 25 741-749
Koedam EL, Pijnenburg YA, Deeg DJ, Baak MM, van der Vlies AE, Scheltens P, and van der Flier WM Early-onset dementia is associated with higher mortality Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 2008 26 147-152
Komarova NL and Thalhauser CJ High degree of heterogeneity in Alzheimer’s disease progression patterns PLoS Comput Biol 2011 7 e1002251
Krasemann S, Madore C, Cialic R, Baufeld C, Calcagno N, El Fatimy R, Beckers L, O’Loughlin E, Xu Y, Fanek Z, et al. The TREM2-APOE pathway drives the transcriptional phenotype of dysfunctional microglia in neurodegenerative diseases Immunity 2017 47 566-581.e569
Landau SM, Lee JQ, Murphy A, Ward TJ, Harrison TM, Baker SL, and Jagust WJ Tau heterogeneity in Aβ positive patients Alzheimer’s Dement 2022 18 e063765
Landau SM, Mintun MA, Joshi AD, Koeppe RA, Petersen RC, Aisen PS, Weiner MW, Jagust WJ, and Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging I Amyloid deposition, hypometabolism, and longitudinal cognitive decline Ann Neurol 2012 72 578-586
Laws KR, Irvine K, and Gale TM Sex differences in Alzheimer’s disease Curr Opin Psychiatry 2018 31 133-139
Lee SI, Jeong W, Lim H, Cho S, Lee H, Jang Y, Cho J, Bae S, Lin YT, Tsai LH, et al. APOE4-carrying human astrocytes oversupply cholesterol to promote neuronal lipid raft expansion and Abeta generation Stem Cell Rep 2021 16 2128-2137
Levine DA, Gross AL, Briceno EM, Tilton N, Giordani BJ, Sussman JB, Hayward RA, Burke JF, Hingtgen S, Elkind MSV, et al. Sex differences in cognitive decline among US adults JAMA Netw Open 2021 4 e210169
Liu CC, Zhao N, Fu Y, Wang N, Linares C, Tsai CW, and Bu G ApoE4 accelerates early seeding of amyloid pathology Neuron 2017 96 1024-1032.e1023
Maphis N, Xu G, Kokiko-Cochran ON, Jiang S, Cardona A, Ransohoff RM, Lamb BT, and Bhaskar K Reactive microglia drive tau pathology and contribute to the spreading of pathological tau in the brain Brain 2015 138 1738-1755
Mhatre-Winters I, Eid A, Han Y, Tieu K, and Richardson JR Sex and APOE genotype alter the basal and induced inflammatory states of primary microglia from APOE targeted replacement mice Int J Mol Sci 2022 23 9829
Moller C, Vrenken H, Jiskoot L, Versteeg A, Barkhof F, Scheltens P, and van der Flier WM Different patterns of gray matter atrophy in early- and late-onset Alzheimer’s disease Neurobiol Aging 2013 34 2014-2022
Morenas-Rodriguez E, Li Y, Nuscher B, Franzmeier N, Xiong C, Suarez-Calvet M, Fagan AM, Schultz S, Gordon BA, Benzinger TLS, et al. Soluble TREM2 in CSF and its association with other biomarkers and cognition in autosomal-dominant Alzheimer’s disease: a longitudinal observational study Lancet Neurol 2022 21 329-341
Morris JC, Roe CM, Xiong C, Fagan AM, Goate AM, Holtzman DM, and Mintun MA APOE predicts amyloid-beta but not tau Alzheimer pathology in cognitively normal aging Ann Neurol 2010 67 122-131
Mosconi L, Berti V, Quinn C, McHugh P, Petrongolo G, Varsavsky I, Osorio RS, Pupi A, Vallabhajosula S, Isaacson RS, et al. Sex differences in Alzheimer risk: Brain imaging of endocrine vs chronologic aging Neurology 2017 89 1382-1390
Nebel RA, Aggarwal NT, Barnes LL, Gallagher A, Goldstein JM, Kantarci K, Mallampalli MP, Mormino EC, Scott L, Yu WH, et al. Understanding the impact of sex and gender in Alzheimer’s disease: a call to action Alzheimers Dement 2018 14 1171-1183
Ophir G, Amariglio N, Jacob-Hirsch J, Elkon R, Rechavi G, and Michaelson DM Apolipoprotein E4 enhances brain inflammation by modulation of the NF-kappaB signaling cascade Neurobiol Dis 2005 20 709-718
Ota H, Akishita M, Akiyoshi T, Kahyo T, Setou M, Ogawa S, Iijima K, Eto M, and Ouchi Y Testosterone deficiency accelerates neuronal and vascular aging of SAMP8 mice: protective role of eNOS and SIRT1 PLoS ONE 2012 7 e29598
Palmqvist S, Scholl M, Strandberg O, Mattsson N, Stomrud E, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Landau S, Jagust W, and Hansson O Earliest accumulation of beta-amyloid occurs within the default-mode network and concurrently affects brain connectivity Nat Commun 2017 8 1214
Parhizkar S and Holtzman DM APOE mediated neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease Semin Immunol 2022 59 101594
Pascoal TA, Benedet AL, Ashton NJ, Kang MS, Therriault J, Chamoun M, Savard M, Lussier FZ, Tissot C, Karikari TK, et al. Microglial activation and tau propagate jointly across Braak stages Nat Med 2021 27 1592-1599
Pichet Binette A, Franzmeier N, Spotorno N, Ewers M, Brendel M, Biel D, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging I, Strandberg O, Janelidze S, Palmqvist S, et al. Amyloid-associated increases in soluble tau relate to tau aggregation rates and cognitive decline in early Alzheimer’s disease Nat Commun 2022 13 6635
Popp J, Oikonomidi A, Tautvydaite D, Dayon L, Bacher M, Migliavacca E, Henry H, Kirkland R, Severin I, Wojcik J, and Bowman GL Markers of neuroinflammation associated with Alzheimer’s disease pathology in older adults Brain Behav Immun 2017 62 203-211
Preische O, Schultz SA, Apel A, Kuhle J, Kaeser SA, Barro C, Graber S, Kuder-Buletta E, LaFougere C, Laske C, et al. Serum neurofilament dynamics predicts neurodegeneration and clinical progression in presymptomatic Alzheimer’s disease Nat Med 2019 25 277-283
R Core Team (2021) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
Reiman EM, Chen K, Liu X, Bandy D, Yu M, Lee W, Ayutyanont N, Keppler J, Reeder SA, Langbaum JB, et al. Fibrillar amyloid-beta burden in cognitively normal people at 3 levels of genetic risk for Alzheimer’s disease Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009 106 6820-6825
Royse SK, Minhas DS, Lopresti BJ, Murphy A, Ward T, Koeppe RA, Bullich S, DeSanti S, Jagust WJ, Landau SM, and Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging I Validation of amyloid PET positivity thresholds in centiloids: a multisite PET study approach Alzheimers Res Ther 2021 13 99
Selkoe DJ and Hardy J The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease at 25 years EMBO Mol Med 2016 8 595-608
Shi Y, Yamada K, Liddelow SA, Smith ST, Zhao L, Luo W, Tsai RM, Spina S, Grinberg LT, Rojas JC, et al. ApoE4 markedly exacerbates tau-mediated neurodegeneration in a mouse model of tauopathy Nature 2017 549 523-527
Shokouhi S, Taylor WD, Albert K, Kang H, Newhouse PA, and Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging I In vivo network models identify sex differences in the spread of tau pathology across the brain Alzheimers Dement 2020 12 e12016
Smith R, Strandberg O, Mattsson-Carlgren N, Leuzy A, Palmqvist S, Pontecorvo MJ, Devous MD, Ossenkoppele R, and Hansson O The accumulation rate of tau aggregates is higher in females and younger amyloid-positive subjects Brain 2020 143 3805-3815
Steward A, Biel D, Dewenter A, Roemer S, Wagner F, Dehsarvi A, Rathore S, Otero Svaldi D, Higgins I, Brendel M, et al. ApoE4 and connectivity-mediated spreading of tau pathology at lower amyloid levels JAMA Neurol 2023 80 1295-1306
Suarez-Calvet M, Kleinberger G, Araque Caballero MA, Brendel M, Rominger A, Alcolea D, Fortea J, Lleo A, Blesa R, Gispert JD, et al. sTREM2 cerebrospinal fluid levels are a potential biomarker for microglia activity in early-stage Alzheimer’s disease and associate with neuronal injury markers EMBO Mol Med 2016 8 466-476
Suarez-Calvet M, Morenas-Rodriguez E, Kleinberger G, Schlepckow K, Araque Caballero MA, Franzmeier N, Capell A, Fellerer K, Nuscher B, Eren E, et al. Early increase of CSF sTREM2 in Alzheimer’s disease is associated with tau related-neurodegeneration but not with amyloid-beta pathology Mol Neurodegener 2019 14 1
Sundermann EE, Panizzon MS, Chen X, Andrews M, Galasko D, Banks SJ, and Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging I Sex differences in Alzheimer’s-related Tau biomarkers and a mediating effect of testosterone Biol Sex Differ 2020 11 33
Tai LM, Ghura S, Koster KP, Liakaite V, Maienschein-Cline M, Kanabar P, Collins N, Ben-Aissa M, Lei AZ, Bahroos N, et al. APOE-modulated Abeta-induced neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease: current landscape, novel data, and future perspective J Neurochem 2015 133 465-488
Therriault J, Benedet AL, Pascoal TA, Mathotaarachchi S, Savard M, Chamoun M, Thomas E, Kang MS, Lussier F, Tissot C, et al. APOEepsilon4 potentiates the relationship between amyloid-beta and tau pathologies Mol Psychiatry 2021 26 5977-5988
Touroutoglou A, Katsumi Y, Brickhouse M, Zaitsev A, Eckbo R, Aisen P, Beckett L, Dage JL, Eloyan A, Foroud T, et al. The sporadic early-onset Alzheimer’s disease signature of atrophy: preliminary findings from the longitudinal early-onset Alzheimer’s disease study (LEADS) cohort Alzheimers Dement 2023 19 Suppl 9 S74-S88
Tsiknia AA, Edland SD, Sundermann EE, Reas ET, Brewer JB, Galasko D, Banks SJ, and Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging I Sex differences in plasma p-tau181 associations with Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers, cognitive decline, and clinical progression Mol Psychiatry 2022 27 4314-4322
Tuisku J, Plaven-Sigray P, Gaiser EC, Airas L, Al-Abdulrasul H, Bruck A, Carson RE, Chen MK, Cosgrove KP, Ekblad L, et al. Effects of age, BMI and sex on the glial cell marker TSPO—a multicentre [(11)C]PBR28 HRRT PET study Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019 46 2329-2338
Ulrich JD, Ulland TK, Mahan TE, Nystrom S, Nilsson KP, Song WM, Zhou Y, Reinartz M, Choi S, Jiang H, et al. ApoE facilitates the microglial response to amyloid plaque pathology J Exp Med 2018 215 1047-1058
van der Vlies AE, Koedam EL, Pijnenburg YA, Twisk JW, Scheltens P, and van der Flier WM Most rapid cognitive decline in APOE epsilon4 negative Alzheimer’s disease with early onset Psychol Med 2009 39 1907-1911
Vest RS and Pike CJ Gender, sex steroid hormones, and Alzheimer’s disease Horm Behav 2013 63 301-307
Villa A, Gelosa P, Castiglioni L, Cimino M, Rizzi N, Pepe G, Lolli F, Marcello E, Sironi L, Vegeto E, and Maggi A Sex-specific features of microglia from adult mice Cell Rep 2018 23 3501-3511
Vogels T, Murgoci AN, and Hromadka T Intersection of pathological tau and microglia at the synapse Acta Neuropathol Commun 2019 7 109
Wang WY, Tan MS, Yu JT, and Tan L Role of pro-inflammatory cytokines released from microglia in Alzheimer’s disease Ann Transl Med 2015 3 136
Wang YT, Pascoal TA, Therriault J, Kang MS, Benedet AL, Savard M, Tissot C, Lussier FZ, Arias JF, Mathotaarachchi S, et al. Interactive rather than independent effect of APOE and sex potentiates tau deposition in women Brain Commun 2021 3 fcab126
Wang YT, Therriault J, Servaes S, Tissot C, Rahmouni N, Macedo AC, Fernandez-Arias J, Mathotaarachchi SS, Benedet AL, Stevenson J, et al. Sex-specific modulation of amyloid-beta on tau phosphorylation underlies faster tangle accumulation in females Brain 2024 147 1497-1510
Xiang X, Wind K, Wiedemann T, Blume T, Shi Y, Briel N, Beyer L, Biechele G, Eckenweber F, Zatcepin A, et al. Microglial activation states drive glucose uptake and FDG-PET alterations in neurodegenerative diseases Sci Transl Med 2021 13 eabe5640
Yong VW Microglia in multiple sclerosis: protectors turn destroyers Neuron 2022 110 3534-3548

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

EMBO Molecular Medicine cover image
Read More
EMBO Molecular Medicine
Vol. 17 | No. 2
12 February 2025
Table of contents
Pages: 235 - 248

Submission history

Received: 2 August 2024
Revision received: 18 December 2024
Accepted: 18 December 2024
Published online: 10 January 2025
Published in issue: 12 February 2025

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Keywords

  1. Alzheimer’s Disease
  2. Microglia
  3. sTREM2
  4. p-tau
  5. Sex Differences

Authors

Affiliations

Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD)University Hospital, LMU Munich Munich Germany
Barcelonaβeta Brain Research Center (BBRC)Pasqual Maragall Foundation Barcelona Spain
IMIM (Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute) Barcelona Spain
Servei de NeurologiaHospital del Mar Barcelona Spain
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fragilidad y Envejecimiento Saludable (CIBERFES) Madrid Spain
Anna Dewenter
Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD)University Hospital, LMU Munich Munich Germany
Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD)University Hospital, LMU Munich Munich Germany
Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD)University Hospital, LMU Munich Munich Germany
Department of NeurologyUniversity Hospital, LMU Munich Munich Germany
Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD)University Hospital, LMU Munich Munich Germany
Zeyu Zhu
Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD)University Hospital, LMU Munich Munich Germany
Julia Pescoller
Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD)University Hospital, LMU Munich Munich Germany
Lukas Frontzkowski
Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD)University Hospital, LMU Munich Munich Germany
Department of Nuclear MedicineUniversity Hospital, LMU Munich Munich Germany
Annika Kreuzer
Department of Nuclear MedicineUniversity Hospital, LMU Munich Munich Germany
German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Munich Germany
Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy) Munich Germany
Chair of Metabolic Biochemistry, Biomedical Center (BMC)Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich Munich Germany
University of Gothenburg, The Sahlgrenska AcademyInstitute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry Mölndal and Gothenburg Sweden
Matthias Brendel
Department of Nuclear MedicineUniversity Hospital, LMU Munich Munich Germany
German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE) Munich Germany
Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy) Munich Germany
Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD)University Hospital, LMU Munich Munich Germany
Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy) Munich Germany
University of Gothenburg, The Sahlgrenska AcademyInstitute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry Mölndal and Gothenburg Sweden

Notes

These authors contributed equally: Matthias Brendel, Nicolai Franzmeier.

Research Funding

LMU, FoeFoLe: 1119
Hertie foundation for clinical neurosciences
SyNergy excellence cluster: EXC 2145/ID 390857198

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

Download Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

View options

PDF

View PDF

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Copy the content Link

Share on social media