Introduction
Encouraging clinical results of recent hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) gene therapy trials are opening novel perspectives for the treatment of monogenic diseases affecting the hematopoietic system. Current gene transfer protocols are based on the modification of bone marrow (BM) or mobilized peripheral blood (mPB)‐derived CD34
+ cells, a cell population enriched in HSC but containing also a large fraction of more committed progenitor cells, termed all together hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC). In this setting, self‐inactivating (SIN) lentiviral vectors (LV) have been successfully used in clinical trials for the treatment of several diseases, as reviewed in Naldini (
2015). Nevertheless, multiple incubations with high vector doses and prolonged
ex vivo culture are required to reach clinically relevant transduction levels, potentially impacting HSPC biological properties (Kajaste‐Rudnitski & Naldini,
2015).
Lentiviral vectors rely on the same cellular machinery as HIV‐1 to reach the nuclear compartment of target cells and integrate within the host genome. During these steps, LV nucleic acids and proteins can potentially be recognized by innate sensors. HIV genomic RNA can activate the cytosolic RNA sensor RIG‐I (Berg
et al,
2012), and cytosolic HIV DNA generated during reverse‐transcription can be sensed by cGAMP synthase (cGAS) in specific cellular contexts, ultimately leading to IFN signaling (Gao
et al,
2013). Other cytosolic nucleic acid sensors such as the DNA‐dependent activator of interferon‐regulatory factors (DAI) could also contribute to sensing of viral replication intermediates (Takaoka
et al,
2007). In the context of LV‐based gene therapy, innate sensing could be exacerbated by the absence of viral accessory proteins known to help immune escape of infectious HIV‐1, envelope pseudotypes that impact the route of entry, the high vector doses that are significantly superior to those of a typical initial infection by HIV‐1, and the presence in the vector stocks of DNA or other contaminants carried over from the producer cells (Kajaste‐Rudnitski & Naldini,
2015). Indeed, LV have been shown to trigger TLR‐dependent innate signaling in immune cells and hepatocytes (Rossetti
et al,
2011; Agudo
et al,
2012). In HSC, innate immune cues are emerging as regulators of stem cell functions and hematopoietic output (King & Goodell,
2011) at the expense of HSC self‐renewal and/or maintenance (Essers
et al,
2009; Baldridge
et al,
2010) and accumulation of DNA damage and senescence (Walter
et al,
2015; Yu
et al,
2015). Only a handful of studies have addressed the impact of innate immune signaling in human HSPC indicating that TLR triggering can lead to skewed differentiation and cause apoptosis (Sioud
et al,
2006; De Luca
et al,
2009; Guo
et al,
2010; Liu
et al,
2012).
HIV integration into the host genome has also been shown to activate DNA damage responses (DDR) in the U2OS osteosarcoma cell line as well in primary CD4
+ T cells (Lau
et al,
2005; Cooper
et al,
2013).The p53 tumor suppressor plays critical roles in several DDR pathways and has been shown to be essential for maintaining quiescence during steady‐state hematopoiesis in murine HSPC (Liu
et al,
2009). Lower levels of p53 have been shown to confer a competitive advantage over HSC expressing more p53 (Bondar & Medzhitov,
2010) and to rescue human HSPC from apoptosis immediately after low‐level irradiation (Milyavsky
et al,
2010).
On these premises, exposure of human HSPC to LV during ex vivo gene transfer could trigger signaling mimicking host cell responses to viral infection with potential short‐ and long‐term consequences that have not been addressed to date. We have investigated here how lentiviral transduction alters the global transcriptional landscape of human HSPC, impacting on their biological properties, shed light on the molecular mechanisms involved, and provide proof‐of‐principle on how to dampen these effects in the context of ex vivo gene therapy.
Discussion
Improving cell recovery as well as rapid and robust engraftment of
ex vivo manipulated HSPC remains a high priority goal for the safe and successful clinical deployment of HSC gene therapy. We have addressed here the impact of LV transduction on the global transcriptional landscape early on upon gene transfer in human HSPC. Very limited changes could be detected with the remarkable absence of innate immune signaling while transduction did activate DNA damage responses. Although HIV‐1 has been shown to activate p53 signaling in primary CD4
+ T cells as well as in the U2OS cell line (Lau
et al,
2005; Cooper
et al,
2013), in both cases induction was strictly dependent on viral integration. Furthermore, p21 may not be the preferential downstream effector of p53 activation in this context as we did not observe significant alterations in its expression levels in CD4
+ T cells and several other cell lines tested upon exposure to LV. Our findings suggest that activation of the p53 signaling in human HSPC upon LV transduction is DNA break independent as it can be triggered also by non‐integrating LV and AAV DNA. Activation of DDR has been shown to occur independently of physical damage to DNA upon chromatin condensation (Burgess
et al,
2014). The predominantly quiescent nature of human HSPC could favor break‐independent activation of DDR as opposed to the actively proliferating CD4
+ T cells or cell lines.
Nuclear sensing of the double‐stranded vector DNA triggered ATM‐dependent activation of p53 in human HSPC. Phosphorylation of the histone variant H2AX is a key feature of ATM‐dependent triggering of a cascade of DDR events, but it is not critical for phosphorylation of ATM substrates such as p53 (Kang
et al,
2005). In agreement with a break‐independent activation of p53 through ATM, we could not detect significant levels of phosphorylated H2AX foci upon transduction. These results also suggest that HIV‐1 integration
per se may not robustly recruit the DNA repair machinery in human HSPC, potentially due to steric protection by the viral pre‐integration complex (Craigie & Bushman,
2012). Interestingly, aberrant nucleic acid accumulation has been suggested to trigger ATM‐dependent DDR responses in mouse embryonic fibroblasts deficient for the cytoplasmic DNA exonuclease Trex1 (Yang
et al,
2007). ATM has also been shown to be activated in the presence of free double‐strand (ds) DNA ends and short single‐stranded (ss) DNA overhangs (Lee & Paull,
2005; Shiotani & Zou,
2009). This type of molecular patterns often characterize viral genetic material and are usually associated with IFN triggering but could also mimic DNA breaks and lead to DDR as reported here.
Both HIV‐1 and MLV DNA have been shown to trigger IFN responses through activation of the cytosolic nucleic acid sensor cGAS (Gao
et al,
2013). There is also emerging evidence regarding cross‐talk between innate immune signaling and DDR (Wu
et al,
2006; Yu
et al,
2015). Indeed, Poly(I:C)‐mediated induction of innate immune responses in HSPC was also accompanied by significant activation of apoptosis‐related pathways. Nevertheless, although we carefully searched for evidence of IFN and NF‐κB signaling in LV‐transduced HSPC, we could not find any significant modulation of these pathways. On the other hand, the MLV‐based ɣRV did trigger substantial expression of several ISG, likely through cytosolic recognition of viral RNA by endosomal TLR or RIG‐I, that could be prevented by blocking type I IFN signaling but was not affected by ATM inhibition. Induction of ISG does not
per se explain why ɣRV failed to trigger p53, as LV still induced p21 in IFN pre‐exposed HSPC. Absence of p53 activation is more likely due to the lower transduction efficiencies of ɣRV in HSPC. The capacity of both LV and AAV to actively enter into the nucleus of non‐dividing, quiescent cells (Bushman
et al,
2005; Nonnenmacher & Weber,
2012), such as HSPC, could allow them to evade the cytosolic sensors that instead detect the ɣRV nucleic acids potentially accumulating in the cytoplasm while waiting for mitosis to occur. Nevertheless, removal of the cPPT from the LV did not lead to ISG expression despite reducing significantly p21 mRNA induction. The rates of cytoplasmic accumulation of the ΔcPPT vector may not be sufficient to trigger cytosolic innate sensors. Furthermore, differences in reverse‐transcription and/or uncoating rates between LV and ɣRV or the exploitation of cellular co‐factors by HIV‐1 could also contribute to avoiding IFN responses to LV in human HSPC (Towers & Noursadeghi,
2014; Sauter & Kirchhoff,
2016). Interestingly, LV transduction did not lead to activation of p53 signaling in murine HSPC, but triggered robust IFN signaling instead. Which are the LV molecular patterns that activate type I IFN in the murine setting remain to be investigated. In human cells, HIV‐1 evades innate immune recognition thanks to its capacity to interact with host factors such as cyclophilin A (CypA) and cleavage and polyadenylation specific factor 6 (CPSF6) (Rasaiyaah
et al,
2013). LV may activate type I IFN responses in murine HSPC due to the absence of some species‐specific co‐factor interactions. Lack of DDR in this setting could be partly due to the higher proliferation rate of murine HSC as compared to the human counterpart (Doulatov
et al,
2012) or preceded by the cytoplasmic triggering of type I IFN responses.
Increased p53 activity has been shown to promote HSPC quiescence (Liu
et al,
2009). We observed that in human HSPC, induction of p53 by LV led to their lower proliferation and a higher fraction of quiescent cells in G
0. This, in principle, could preserve the repopulating cells during gene transfer, as quiescence maintains greater stem cell capacity compared with more frequently dividing cells (Wilson
et al,
2008). Furthermore, the transduced HSPC could engraft more compared to controls
in vivo due to the LV‐induced higher frequency of cells in G
0 (Doulatov
et al,
2012). The parallel induction of apoptosis seems however to counterbalance these potential benefits, in particular in the fraction containing the short‐term repopulating HSPC, as significantly lower percentages of human cells were retrieved from mice having received transduced HSPC. On the other hand, decreased p53 levels have been shown to rescue human HSPC from irradiation‐induced programmed cell death (Milyavsky
et al,
2010) and direct knockdown of p21 has been suggested to improve their engraftment (Zhang
et al,
2005). We show that inhibition of p53 activation by transiently blocking the upstream activator ATM during LV transduction partially rescued
ex vivo apoptosis of human HSPC leading to higher engraftment
in vivo, without affecting gene transfer efficiency. Noteworthy, although ATM inhibition rescued LV‐induced apoptosis, it did not impact the reduced HSPC proliferation. These data favor the hypothesis that a window of non‐apoptotic quiescence can be reached in these conditions yielding improved HSPC engraftment. In this setting, also control cells seemed to benefit from ATM inhibition suggesting that transplantation
per se may activate potentially harmful p53 signaling in HSPC, as suggested also by experiments in which p53 knockdown HSPC engrafted more compared to control transduced counterparts even in the absence of irradiation‐induced DNA damage (Milyavsky
et al,
2010).
The transient wave of p53 signaling did not lead to any apparent long‐term consequences as engraftment levels tended to normalize over time between untransduced and treated HSPC and the long‐term repopulating stem cell frequencies remained unaffected, in agreement with unaltered telomere length and gene expression profiles observed in LV‐transduced rhesus macaques HSPC long‐term
in vivo (Sellers
et al,
2014). Our finding that both integrating and non‐integrating vectors do not detectably affect the biological properties of long‐term HSPC despite triggering similar molecular responses as observed for the short‐term repopulating ones underscores biological differences between these two subsets of HSPC, warranting further investigation in future. The more persistent proliferation arrest observed in the primitive CD34
+CD133
+CD90
+ fraction could in part account for better preserving the long‐term HSPC engraftment potential. Furthermore, it is possible that the long‐term HSPC are less sensitive to DDR, as recently reported for quiescent versus activated murine HSPC (Walter
et al,
2015).
The negative impact LV‐mediated p53 signaling has on the short‐term hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (ST‐HSPC) engraftment could be of relevance as rapid engraftment is critical for a safe and successful clinical outcome. Indeed, neutropenia‐related infections remain a major cause of mortality and morbidity in both autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT; Pagano
et al,
2017; Tomblyn
et al,
2009) and significant efforts are ongoing to prompt early HSPC engraftment (Lund
et al,
2015; Kandalla
et al,
2016; Baron & Nagler,
2017). Prolonged neutropenia due to delayed engraftment remains a major issue also in HSPC gene therapy. Of note, the neutrophil recovery time tends to be slightly longer in this context and does not seem to correlate with the cell dose (Sessa
et al,
2016). Clonal tracking studies performed in the context of a gene therapy trial to treat the Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome (WAS) suggest that ST‐HSPC plays an important role in these first phases of engraftment and hematopoietic reconstitution in humans (Biasco
et al,
2016). This notion is further supported in the murine setting in which the early phase of hematopoietic reconstitution has been shown to be almost exclusively supported by the ST‐HSPC‐enriched CD34
+CD38
+ fraction of HSPC (Zonari
et al,
2017). Overall, these observations suggest that loss of ST‐HSPC may be particularly relevant in settings in which
ex vivo manipulation of HSPC is required.
Our results suggest that gene therapy vectors can contribute to delayed HSPC engraftment, although we cannot exclude a potential effect also of the growth conditions during their
ex vivo manipulation. Moreover, LV‐mediated signaling may have more pronounced functional consequences in the context of diseases characterized by an elevated pro‐inflammatory state or by genetic defects impacting the DDR pathways. Transient ATM inhibition provides proof‐of‐principle that dampening this vector signaling could improve hematopoietic reconstitution, although further safety assessments are certainly warranted regarding the potential unwanted effects these approaches may have. Inhibiting p21 induction could also render the second round of LV transduction used in current gene therapy protocols more efficient as p21 has been suggested to restrict HIV‐1 integration in human CD34
+ HSPC (Zhang
et al,
2007). Conversely, induction of DDR pathways by IDLV or AAV donor vectors could potentially benefit targeted HSPC gene editing. Indeed, both IDLV and AAV have been reported to perform efficiently as donor DNA templates, possibly because of the here described induction of DDR and thus repair. On the other hand, also AAV‐exposed HSPC have been recently shown to engraft less than their unmanipulated counterparts as shown here for LV‐exposed cells (Dever
et al,
2016). Development of strategies to specifically block the apoptosis‐inducing arm of the vector signaling while preserving the component of DDR that potentially promotes HR could further improve targeted gene editing efficiency in human HSPC.
Overall, our studies shed light on the molecular mechanisms and functional consequences of gene therapy vector sensing in human HSPC. Better knowledge regarding these vector–host interactions will allow the development of more stealth gene therapy protocols. This will be of particular relevance in the context of specific disease settings in which vector signaling might impact more dramatically both gene transfer efficiency and HSPC biology. Furthermore, deeper understanding of the signaling cascades activated by non‐integrating vector platforms in HSPC will contribute to the design of more efficient therapeutic protocols in the context of the rapidly expanding field of targeted genome editing.